From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: gleb@kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] KVM: MMU: fix decoding cache type from MTRR
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 09:32:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A36976.6090807@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55A2B8F7.1050805@linux.intel.com>
On 12/07/2015 20:59, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
>
> On 07/13/2015 01:33 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 14:42 +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>> There are some bugs in current get_mtrr_type();
>>> 1: bit 1 of mtrr_state->enabled is corresponding bit 11 of
>>> IA32_MTRR_DEF_TYPE MSR which completely control MTRR's enablement
>>> that means other bits are ignored if it is cleared
>>>
>>> 2: the fixed MTRR ranges are controlled by bit 0 of
>>> mtrr_state->enabled (bit 10 of IA32_MTRR_DEF_TYPE)
>>>
>>> 3: if MTRR is disabled, UC is applied to all of physical memory rather
>>> than mtrr_state->def_type
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 14 ++++++--------
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>> I'm seeing a significant regression in boot performance on Intel
>> hardware with assigned devices that bisects back to this patch. There's
>> a long delay with Seabios between the version splash and execution of
>> option ROMs, and a _very_ long delay with OVMF before the display is
>> initialized. The delay is long enough that users are reporting their
>> previously working VM is hung with 100% CPU usage on v4.2-rc1. Thanks,
>>
>
> Alex, thanks for your report. I will try to reproduce and fix it asap.
The code that Bandan pointed out
+ /* MTRR is completely disabled, use UC for all of physical memory. */
+ if (!(mtrr_state->enabled & 0x2))
+ return MTRR_TYPE_UNCACHABLE;
actually disappears in commit fa61213746a7 (KVM: MTRR: simplify
kvm_mtrr_get_guest_memory_type, 2015-06-15). Should mtrr_default_type
actually be something like this:
static u8 mtrr_default_type(struct kvm_mtrr *mtrr_state)
{
if (mtrr_is_enabled(mtrr_state))
return mtrr_state->deftype & IA32_MTRR_DEF_TYPE_TYPE_MASK;
else
return MTRR_TYPE_UNCACHABLE;
}
? Then it's easy to add a quirk that makes the default WRITEBACK until
MTRRs are enabled.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-13 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-13 6:42 [PATCH v3 00/10] KVM: MTRR fixes and some cleanups Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-13 6:42 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] KVM: MMU: fix decoding cache type from MTRR Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-13 8:09 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-07-12 17:33 ` Alex Williamson
2015-07-12 18:59 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-07-13 7:32 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-07-13 14:45 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-07-13 15:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-13 15:15 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-07-14 21:12 ` MTRR setup in OVMF [was: PATCH v3 01/10 KVM: MMU: fix decoding cache type from MTRR] Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-14 21:15 ` [edk2] " Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-14 21:29 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-14 22:37 ` Jordan Justen
2015-07-15 9:57 ` [edk2] " Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-15 0:14 ` Fan, Jeff
2015-07-15 19:30 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-07-15 19:41 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-12 19:12 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] KVM: MMU: fix decoding cache type from MTRR Bandan Das
2015-05-13 6:42 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] KVM: MMU: introduce for_each_rmap_spte() Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-13 6:42 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] KVM: MMU: introduce PT_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-13 6:42 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] KVM: MMU: introduce for_each_slot_rmap_range Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-13 6:42 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] KVM: MMU: introduce slot_handle_level_range() and its helpers Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-13 6:42 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] KVM: MMU: use slot_handle_level and its helper to clean up the code Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-13 6:42 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] KVM: MMU: introduce kvm_zap_rmapp Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-13 6:42 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] KVM: MMU: introduce kvm_zap_gfn_range Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-13 6:42 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] KVM: MMU: fix MTRR update Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-13 8:43 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-05-13 14:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-14 0:16 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-05-14 8:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-13 6:42 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] KVM: x86: do not reset mmu if CR0.CD and CR0.NW are changed Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-13 14:14 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] KVM: MTRR fixes and some cleanups Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A36976.6090807@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).