From: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: gleb@kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] KVM: MMU: fix decoding cache type from MTRR
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 22:45:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A3CEF2.2030200@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55A36976.6090807@redhat.com>
On 07/13/2015 03:32 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> I'm seeing a significant regression in boot performance on Intel
>>> hardware with assigned devices that bisects back to this patch. There's
>>> a long delay with Seabios between the version splash and execution of
>>> option ROMs, and a _very_ long delay with OVMF before the display is
>>> initialized. The delay is long enough that users are reporting their
>>> previously working VM is hung with 100% CPU usage on v4.2-rc1. Thanks,
>>>
>>
>> Alex, thanks for your report. I will try to reproduce and fix it asap.
>
I have reproduced the issue and I think Bandan and Paolo is correct.
> The code that Bandan pointed out
>
> + /* MTRR is completely disabled, use UC for all of physical memory. */
> + if (!(mtrr_state->enabled & 0x2))
> + return MTRR_TYPE_UNCACHABLE;
>
> actually disappears in commit fa61213746a7 (KVM: MTRR: simplify
> kvm_mtrr_get_guest_memory_type, 2015-06-15). Should mtrr_default_type
> actually be something like this:
:(
Based on the SDM, UC is applied to all memory rather than default-type
if MTRR is disabled.
If i changed the code to:
if (!(mtrr_state->enabled & 0x2))
return mtrr_state->def_type;
the result is the same as before.
However, fast boot came back if "return 0xFF" here. So fast boot expects
that the memory type is WB.
>
> static u8 mtrr_default_type(struct kvm_mtrr *mtrr_state)
> {
> if (mtrr_is_enabled(mtrr_state))
> return mtrr_state->deftype & IA32_MTRR_DEF_TYPE_TYPE_MASK;
> else
> return MTRR_TYPE_UNCACHABLE;
> }
>
> ? Then it's easy to add a quirk that makes the default WRITEBACK until
> MTRRs are enabled.
It is the wrong configure in OVMF... shall we need to adjust KVM to satisfy
OVMF?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-13 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-13 6:42 [PATCH v3 00/10] KVM: MTRR fixes and some cleanups Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-13 6:42 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] KVM: MMU: fix decoding cache type from MTRR Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-13 8:09 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-07-12 17:33 ` Alex Williamson
2015-07-12 18:59 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-07-13 7:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-13 14:45 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2015-07-13 15:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-13 15:15 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-07-14 21:12 ` MTRR setup in OVMF [was: PATCH v3 01/10 KVM: MMU: fix decoding cache type from MTRR] Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-14 21:15 ` [edk2] " Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-14 21:29 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-14 22:37 ` Jordan Justen
2015-07-15 9:57 ` [edk2] " Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-15 0:14 ` Fan, Jeff
2015-07-15 19:30 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-07-15 19:41 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-07-12 19:12 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] KVM: MMU: fix decoding cache type from MTRR Bandan Das
2015-05-13 6:42 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] KVM: MMU: introduce for_each_rmap_spte() Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-13 6:42 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] KVM: MMU: introduce PT_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-13 6:42 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] KVM: MMU: introduce for_each_slot_rmap_range Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-13 6:42 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] KVM: MMU: introduce slot_handle_level_range() and its helpers Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-13 6:42 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] KVM: MMU: use slot_handle_level and its helper to clean up the code Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-13 6:42 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] KVM: MMU: introduce kvm_zap_rmapp Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-13 6:42 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] KVM: MMU: introduce kvm_zap_gfn_range Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-13 6:42 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] KVM: MMU: fix MTRR update Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-13 8:43 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-05-13 14:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-14 0:16 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-05-14 8:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-13 6:42 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] KVM: x86: do not reset mmu if CR0.CD and CR0.NW are changed Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-13 14:14 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] KVM: MTRR fixes and some cleanups Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A3CEF2.2030200@linux.intel.com \
--to=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).