From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: arm/arm64: Allow to use KVM without in-kernel irqchip Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 10:02:08 +0100 Message-ID: <55B5F390.4090303@arm.com> References: <55A93488.9060408@arm.com> <00df01d0c22b$fcaef0d0$f60cd270$@samsung.com> <55ACAC73.9090500@arm.com> <03d901d0c44e$beadaa90$3c08ffb0$@samsung.com> <55B11AEC.4050804@arm.com> <008f01d0c625$45d91a90$d18b4fb0$@samsung.com> <55B26277.80205@arm.com> <007901d0c7a1$99981f50$ccc85df0$@samsung.com> <55B5DD88.5070203@arm.com> <00d101d0c847$6039ac50$20ad04f0$@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: 'Christoffer Dall' , 'Eric Auger' To: Pavel Fedin , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" Return-path: Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:51491 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751071AbbG0JCL (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2015 05:02:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <00d101d0c847$6039ac50$20ad04f0$@samsung.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 27/07/15 09:36, Pavel Fedin wrote: > Hello! > >>> And i agreed. So, i repeat the question. Will it be OK if we just >>> enable KVM without both vGIC and vTimer, and that's all we do? It >>> will be userland's problem how to handle them. I need to tweak my >>> first patchset a very small bit in order to do this. >> >> I I'll repeat what I already said: "Show me the patches". >> >> I'll only give you an answer once I exactly know what you're up to. > > You have already seen them, it is the very same patchset we are discussing in this thread. And I've replied ten days ago. So far, I haven't seen a v3 that addresses the comments I had. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...