From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] KVM: add KVM_USER_EXIT vm ioctl for userspace exit Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 15:29:54 +0200 Message-ID: <55C20FD2.8020607@redhat.com> References: <1438780877-31838-1-git-send-email-rkrcmar@redhat.com> <1438780877-31838-4-git-send-email-rkrcmar@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1438780877-31838-4-git-send-email-rkrcmar@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 05/08/2015 15:21, Radim Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99 wrote: > + kvm_for_each_vcpu(idx, vcpu, kvm) > + if (vcpu->vcpu_id =3D=3D vcpu_id) { > + kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EXIT, vcpu); > + kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu); > + > + return 0; > + } > + Why not a vcpu ioctl? kvm_for_each_vcpu can become pretty expensive if you have a few dozen VCPUs. Paolo