From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] arm64: 16K translation granule support Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 11:11:05 +0100 Message-ID: <55E6CB39.5000305@arm.com> References: <1439465645-22584-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: KVM devel mailing list , Marc Zyngier , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" To: Ard Biesheuvel Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 02/09/15 10:55, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 13 August 2015 at 13:33, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: >> From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" >> >> Patches 1-7 cleans up the kernel page size handling code. >> Patches 8-11 Fixes some issues with the KVM bits, mainly the fake PGD >> handling code. >> Patch 12 Adds a check to ensure the CPU supports the selected granule size. >> Patch 13-14 Adds the 16k page size support bits. >> >> This series applies on top of for-next/core branch of the aarch64 tree and is >> also available here: >> >> git://linux-arm.org/linux-skp.git 16k/v1 >> > > > Hi Suzuki, > > I have given this a spin on the FVP Base model to check UEFI booting, > and everything seems to work fine. (I tested 2-level and 3-level) > I didn't test the KVM changes, so for all patches except those: > > Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel > Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel Thanks for the review and testing !! Suzuki