From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Nan Xiao <xiaonan830818@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A question about "CONFIG_KVM_DEVICE_ASSIGNMENT" configuration
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:55:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F22689.5060005@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441897716.20355.565.camel@redhat.com>
On 9/10/2015 11:08 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 18:22 +0800, Nan Xiao wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> When building kernel, it prompts "CONFIG_KVM_DEVICE_ASSIGNMENT" is "deprecated".
>> But it is still used in kernel code. E.g.:
>> "kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension" function:
>> {
>> ...
>> #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_DEVICE_ASSIGNMENT
>> case KVM_CAP_ASSIGN_DEV_IRQ:
>> case KVM_CAP_PCI_2_3:
>> #endif
>> r = 1;
>> break;
>> ...
>> #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_DEVICE_ASSIGNMENT
>> case KVM_CAP_IOMMU:
>> r = iommu_present(&pci_bus_type);
>> break;
>> #endif
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> If not configure this option, the following code will execute failed:
>>
>> ret = ioctl(dev, KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION, KVM_CAP_IOMMU);
>>
>> So does it mean to use KVM assigned device feature, the
>> "CONFIG_KVM_DEVICE_ASSIGNMENT"
>> is not "deprecated"?
>
> Legacy KVM device assignment is deprecated, it is fully replaced by
Why do we remove this legacy assignment completely? Its always leading
to this confusion :)
Thanks
Tiejun
> VFIO-based device assignment. The intention is to deprecate legacy KVM
> device assignment now, so all users can transition away from it and at
> some point remove it from the kernel. When using QEMU and libvirt, the
> default is already to use VFIO instead of legacy KVM device assignment.
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-11 0:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-10 10:22 A question about "CONFIG_KVM_DEVICE_ASSIGNMENT" configuration Nan Xiao
2015-09-10 15:08 ` Alex Williamson
2015-09-10 23:58 ` Nan Xiao
2015-09-11 0:18 ` Alex Williamson
2015-09-11 0:42 ` Nan Xiao
2015-09-11 0:55 ` Chen, Tiejun [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55F22689.5060005@intel.com \
--to=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiaonan830818@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox