From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 12/17] KVM: Implement IRQ bypass consumer callbacks for x86 Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 12:31:52 +0200 Message-ID: <55F2AD98.3050605@redhat.com> References: <1440492620-15934-1-git-send-email-feng.wu@intel.com> <1440492620-15934-13-git-send-email-feng.wu@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: eric.auger@linaro.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Feng Wu , alex.williamson@redhat.com, joro@8bytes.org, mtosatti@redhat.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1440492620-15934-13-git-send-email-feng.wu@intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 25/08/2015 10:50, Feng Wu wrote: > + struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd = > + container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer); > + > + irqfd->producer = prod; This assignment should be under "if (kvm_x86_ops->update_pi_irte)". > + return kvm_arch_update_pi_irte(irqfd->kvm, prod->irq, irqfd->gsi, 1); > +} > + > +void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons, > + struct irq_bypass_producer *prod) > +{ > + int ret; > + struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd = > + container_of(cons, struct kvm_kernel_irqfd, consumer); > + > + irqfd->producer = NULL; And here it should be like: if (!kvm_x86_ops->update_pi_irte) { WARN_ON(irqfd->producer != NULL); return; } WARN_ON(irqfd->producer != prod); irqfd->producer = NULL; Paolo > +