public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] KVM: x86/tsc: Don't sync user changes to TSC with KVM-initiated change
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 16:41:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55dc9282-56c1-8574-0ba1-4bbf075f4c3e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d39a25a85750e99e11f6b8a58dcd0560f5463f97.camel@infradead.org>

On 13/9/2023 4:10 pm, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-08-11 at 15:59 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> The problem isn't that the sync code doesn't differentiate between kernel and
>> user-initiated writes, because parts of the code *do* differentiate.  I think it's
>> more accurate to say that the problem is that the sync code doesn't differentiate
>> between userspace initializing the TSC and userspace attempting to synchronize the
>> TSC.
> 
> I'm not utterly sure that *I* differentiate between userspace
> "initializing the TSC" and attempting to "synchronize the TSC". What
> *is* the difference?

I'd be more inclined to Oliver's explanation in this version of the changelog
that different tsc_offsets are used to calculate guest_tsc value between the vcpu
is created and when it is first set by usersapce. This extra synchronization is not
expected for guest based on user's bugzilla report.

> 
> Userspace is merely *setting* the TSC for a given vCPU, regardless of
> whether other vCPUs even exist.
> 
> But we have to work around the fundamental brokenness of the legacy
> API, whose semantics are most accurately described as "Please set the
> TSC to precisely <x> because that's what it should have been *some*
> time around now, if I wasn't preempted very much between when I
> calculated it and when you see this ioctl".
> 
> That's why — for the legacy API only — we have this hack to make the
> TSCs *actually* in sync if they're close. Because without it, there;s
> *no* way the VMM can restore a guest with its TSCs actually in sync.
> 
> I think the best answer to the bug report that led to this patch is
> just "Don't use the legacy API then". Use KVM_VCPU_TSC_OFFSET which is
> defined as "the TSC was <x> at KVM time <y>" and is actually *sane*.
> 

Two hands in favor. Using the new KVM_VCPU_TSC_OFFSET API and a little
fix on the legacy API is not conflict. Thank you for reviewing it.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-13  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-01  3:45 [PATCH v4] KVM: x86/tsc: Don't sync user changes to TSC with KVM-initiated change Like Xu
2023-08-11 22:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-13  8:10   ` David Woodhouse
2023-09-13  8:41     ` Like Xu [this message]
2023-09-13  8:44       ` David Woodhouse
2023-09-13  8:31   ` David Woodhouse
2023-09-13 14:50     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-13 15:05       ` David Woodhouse
2023-09-13 15:15         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-09-13 15:24           ` David Woodhouse
2023-09-14  3:24             ` Like Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55dc9282-56c1-8574-0ba1-4bbf075f4c3e@gmail.com \
    --to=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox