From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/msr: Carry on after a non-"safe" MSR access
 fails without !panic_on_oops
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:12:36 +0200
Message-ID: <56010D74.9020808@redhat.com>
References: <cover.1442793572.git.luto@kernel.org>
 <130a3b7ef4788baae3a6fe71293ab17442bc9a0a.1442793572.git.luto@kernel.org>
 <CA+55aFy4Chd-PJvxGne=TztPsvFqUG07Ht8mtc4+0oGNZNDOyw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALCETrXqsKcqzfqMO2ctOJJ4X8Kb6vvoUpVDir9F2-a3XwK23w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150921084642.GA30984@gmail.com>
 <CA+55aFzKCi6pf0RP8HjDQYDsms6reB5AihuCAHEkVJtoOHk_Yw@mail.gmail.com>
 <56003506.1050100@linux.intel.com>
 <CALCETrUSEm_QLxGaBdmy3tQn=WnagvzTaYpy+i14sGUeaOUvTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	xen-devel <Xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrUSEm_QLxGaBdmy3tQn=WnagvzTaYpy+i14sGUeaOUvTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org



On 21/09/2015 19:43, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> And maybe the KVM user return notifier.

No, not really.  If anything, the place in KVM where it makes a
difference is vmx_save_host_state, which is also only using
always-present MSRs.  But don't care about KVM.

First clean it up, then we can add back inline versions like __rdmsr or
rdmsr_fault or rdmsr_unsafe or whatever.

Paolo