From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: emulate the INVVPID instruction Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 09:53:34 +0200 Message-ID: <5604FD7E.3060901@redhat.com> References: <56026541.7030000@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Wanpeng Li , Jan Kiszka , Wincy Van , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Bandan Das Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 24/09/2015 17:45, Bandan Das wrote: > > However, I have applied the patch to kvm/queue. Please send the changes > > separately, and I will squash them in the existing VPID patch. > > Please don't do this. It's making it really difficult to review these > patches individually :( Why not let them get some review time before > applying them all together ? Ok---I did it because it makes sense to keep this patch separate from the others. You can expose VPID even if vpid02 == vpid01 (in fact that's what happens if KVM cannot find a vpid02) and in that case this patch provides a valid implementation of INVVPID. Do you think it would help if I posted the whole kvm/queue contents a few days before pushing it to kvm/next? Paolo