From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>,
"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] KVM: arm/arm64: VGIC: don't track used LRs in the distributor
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 11:32:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560E5D2F.1000401@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00cb01d0fcf8$6a906000$3fb12000$@samsung.com>
Hi Pavel,
On 02/10/15 10:55, Pavel Fedin wrote:
> Hello! One more concern.
>
>> Currently we track which IRQ has been mapped to which VGIC list
>> register and also have to synchronize both. We used to do this
>> to hold some extra state (for instance the active bit).
>> It turns out that this extra state in the LRs is no longer needed and
>> this extra tracking causes some pain later.
>
> Returning to the beginning, can you explain, what kind of pain exactly does it bring?
> For some reasons here i had to keep all this tracking mechanism, and modified your patchset. I see
> no significant problems, except memory usage. I have to allocate vgic_irq_lr_map large enough to
> hold indexes up to 16384, and indexes from dist->nr_irqs to 8192 appear to be not used.
Yes, this was the main problem I was concerned about. Actually not so
much about memory usage really, but more about the idea of pushing the
concept of bitmaps beyond the point where it is a reasonable data
structure to use.
I briefly thought about extending the bitmaps, but that sounded like a
hack to me.
For instance how did you come up with that 16384? LPIs could actually be
much bigger (in fact the emulation currently support up to 64k).
In my opinion removing that tracking mechanism is actually a good idea.
Most implementations actually have only _four_ list registers and since
we keep them shadowed in our KVM data structure, iterating over all of
them is not really painful.
> Since the map itself is actually used only for piggy-back optimization, it is possible to easily
> get rid of it using for_each_set_bit(lr, vgic_cpu->lr_used, vgic->nr_lr) iteration instead.
Can't you use the ELRSR bitmap instead? The idea of lr_used sounds like
a moot optimization to me.
Cheers,
Andre.
> The rest
> of mechanism will work as it is, there's no need to remove the state tracking bitmap and
> optimization itself.
> I am currently testing this approach and preparing my alternative patch for upstreaming.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-02 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-10 14:21 [PATCH v2 00/15] KVM: arm64: GICv3 ITS emulation Andre Przywara
2015-07-10 14:21 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] KVM: arm/arm64: VGIC: don't track used LRs in the distributor Andre Przywara
2015-08-12 9:01 ` Eric Auger
2015-08-24 16:33 ` Andre Przywara
2015-08-31 8:42 ` Eric Auger
2015-09-02 9:00 ` Andre Przywara
2015-10-02 9:55 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-10-02 10:32 ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2015-10-02 10:39 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-10-02 12:39 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-10-02 12:49 ` Andre Przywara
2015-07-10 14:21 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] KVM: extend struct kvm_msi to hold a 32-bit device ID Andre Przywara
2015-07-10 14:21 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] KVM: arm/arm64: add emulation model specific destroy function Andre Przywara
2015-07-10 14:21 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] KVM: arm/arm64: extend arch CAP checks to allow per-VM capabilities Andre Przywara
2015-08-12 12:26 ` Eric Auger
2015-07-10 14:21 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] KVM: arm/arm64: make GIC frame address initialization model specific Andre Przywara
2015-08-12 13:02 ` Eric Auger
2015-08-24 17:24 ` Andre Przywara
2015-08-31 9:31 ` Eric Auger
2015-07-10 14:21 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] KVM: arm64: Introduce new MMIO region for the ITS base address Andre Przywara
2015-08-13 12:17 ` Eric Auger
2015-07-10 14:21 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] KVM: arm64: handle ITS related GICv3 redistributor registers Andre Przywara
2015-08-13 12:17 ` Eric Auger
2015-08-24 18:08 ` Andre Przywara
2015-07-10 14:21 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] KVM: arm64: introduce ITS emulation file with stub functions Andre Przywara
2015-08-13 12:48 ` Eric Auger
2015-08-25 9:39 ` Andre Przywara
2015-07-10 14:21 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] KVM: arm64: implement basic ITS register handlers Andre Przywara
2015-08-13 15:25 ` Eric Auger
2015-08-25 10:23 ` Andre Przywara
2015-10-02 7:51 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-07-10 14:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] KVM: arm64: add data structures to model ITS interrupt translation Andre Przywara
2015-08-13 15:46 ` Eric Auger
2015-08-25 11:15 ` Andre Przywara
2015-08-27 14:16 ` Eric Auger
2015-07-10 14:21 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] KVM: arm64: handle pending bit for LPIs in ITS emulation Andre Przywara
2015-08-14 11:58 ` Eric Auger
2015-08-25 14:34 ` Andre Przywara
2015-08-31 9:45 ` Eric Auger
2015-10-07 8:39 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-10-07 19:53 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-07-10 14:21 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] KVM: arm64: sync LPI configuration and pending tables Andre Przywara
2015-08-14 11:58 ` Eric Auger
2015-08-14 12:35 ` Eric Auger
2015-08-25 15:47 ` Andre Przywara
2015-08-31 9:51 ` Eric Auger
2015-08-25 15:27 ` Andre Przywara
2015-08-31 9:47 ` Eric Auger
2015-07-10 14:21 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] KVM: arm64: implement ITS command queue command handlers Andre Przywara
2015-08-17 13:33 ` Eric Auger
2015-10-07 14:54 ` Andre Przywara
2015-07-10 14:21 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] KVM: arm64: implement MSI injection in ITS emulation Andre Przywara
2015-07-31 13:22 ` Eric Auger
2015-08-02 20:20 ` Andre Przywara
2015-08-03 6:41 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-08-03 9:07 ` Eric Auger
2015-08-03 9:16 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-08-03 15:37 ` Eric Auger
2015-08-03 17:06 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-08-04 6:53 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-08-24 14:14 ` Andre Przywara
2015-08-17 13:44 ` Eric Auger
2015-07-10 14:21 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] KVM: arm64: enable ITS emulation as a virtual MSI controller Andre Przywara
2015-07-15 9:10 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-07-15 9:52 ` Andre Przywara
2015-07-15 10:01 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-07-15 12:02 ` [PATCH v2 00/15] KVM: arm64: GICv3 ITS emulation Pavel Fedin
2015-09-24 11:18 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-09-24 11:35 ` Andre Przywara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=560E5D2F.1000401@arm.com \
--to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=Marc.Zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=p.fedin@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).