From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>, Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>,
Dirk Mueller <dmueller@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: svm: Only propagate next_rip when guest supports it
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 13:15:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5617A1BF.8080908@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444384276-23732-1-git-send-email-joro@8bytes.org>
On 09/10/2015 11:51, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
>
> Currently we always write the next_rip of the shadow vmcb to
> the guests vmcb when we emulate a vmexit. This could confuse
> the guest when its cpuid indicated no support for the
> next_rip feature.
>
> Fix this by only propagating next_rip if the guest actually
> supports it.
>
> Cc: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
> Cc: Dirk Mueller <dmueller@suse.com>
> Tested-by: Dirk Mueller <dmueller@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 4 +++-
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> index dd05b9c..effca1f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> @@ -133,4 +133,25 @@ static inline bool guest_cpuid_has_mpx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 7, 0);
> return best && (best->ebx & bit(X86_FEATURE_MPX));
> }
> +
> +/*
> + * NRIPS is provided through cpuidfn 0x8000000a.edx bit 3
> + */
> +#define BIT_NRIPS 3
> +
> +static inline bool guest_cpuid_has_nrips(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *best;
> +
> + best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x8000000a, 0);
> +
> + /*
> + * NRIPS is a scattered cpuid feature, so we can't use
> + * X86_FEATURE_NRIPS here (X86_FEATURE_NRIPS would be bit
> + * position 8, not 3).
> + */
> + return best && (best->edx & bit(BIT_NRIPS));
> +}
> +#undef BIT_NRIPS
> +
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index 2f9ed1f..4084b33 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -2365,7 +2365,9 @@ static int nested_svm_vmexit(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> nested_vmcb->control.exit_info_2 = vmcb->control.exit_info_2;
> nested_vmcb->control.exit_int_info = vmcb->control.exit_int_info;
> nested_vmcb->control.exit_int_info_err = vmcb->control.exit_int_info_err;
> - nested_vmcb->control.next_rip = vmcb->control.next_rip;
> +
> + if (guest_cpuid_has_nrips(&svm->vcpu))
This could be a bit expensive to do on every vmexit. Can you benchmark
it with kvm-unit-tests, or just cache the result in struct vcpu_svm?
Thanks,
Paolo
> + nested_vmcb->control.next_rip = vmcb->control.next_rip;
>
> /*
> * If we emulate a VMRUN/#VMEXIT in the same host #vmexit cycle we have
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-09 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-09 9:51 [PATCH] kvm: svm: Only propagate next_rip when guest supports it Joerg Roedel
2015-10-09 11:15 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-10-14 13:10 ` [PATCH v2] " Joerg Roedel
2015-10-14 15:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-10-01 11:43 [PATCH] Use WARN_ON_ONCE for missing X86_FEATURE_NRIPS Dirk Müller
2015-10-01 12:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-01 22:31 ` Bandan Das
2015-10-06 10:28 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-10-06 17:59 ` Bandan Das
2015-10-07 11:03 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-10-07 12:47 ` [PATCH] kvm: svm: Only propagate next_rip when guest supports it Joerg Roedel
2015-10-07 12:57 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-07 15:48 ` Bandan Das
2015-10-07 16:14 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-10-07 17:03 ` Dirk Müller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5617A1BF.8080908@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=bsd@redhat.com \
--cc=dmueller@suse.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).