kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janusz <januszmk6@gmail.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>,
	Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: edk2-devel@ml01.01.org, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2] KVM: MTRR: fix memory type handling if MTRR is completely disabled
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:21:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <561F53FD.7070303@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561F516D.7070504@linux.intel.com>

W dniu 15.10.2015 o 09:10, Xiao Guangrong pisze:
>
>
> On 10/15/2015 02:58 PM, Janusz wrote:
>> W dniu 15.10.2015 o 08:41, Xiao Guangrong pisze:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/15/2015 02:19 PM, Janusz wrote:
>>>> W dniu 15.10.2015 o 06:19, Xiao Guangrong pisze:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, the bug may be not in KVM. When this bug happened, i saw OVMF
>>>>> only checked 1 CPU out, there is the log from OVMF's debug input:
>>>>>
>>>>>     Flushing GCD
>>>>>     Flushing GCD
>>>>>     Flushing GCD
>>>>>     Flushing GCD
>>>>>     Flushing GCD
>>>>>     Flushing GCD
>>>>>     Flushing GCD
>>>>>     Flushing GCD
>>>>>     Flushing GCD
>>>>>     Flushing GCDs
>>>>> Detect CPU count: 1
>>>>>
>>>>> So that the startup code has been freed however the APs are still
>>>>> running,
>>>>> i think that why we saw the vCPUs executed on unexpected address.
>>>>>
>>>>> After digging into OVMF's code, i noticed that BSP CPU waits for APs
>>>>> for a fixed timer period, however, KVM recent changes require zap all
>>>>> mappings if CR0.CD is changed, that means the APs need more time to
>>>>> startup.
>>>>>
>>>>> After following changes to OVMF, the bug is completely gone on my
>>>>> side:
>>>>>
>>>>> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe/ApStartup.c
>>>>> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe/ApStartup.c
>>>>> @@ -454,7 +454,9 @@ StartApsStackless (
>>>>>      //
>>>>>      // Wait 100 milliseconds for APs to arrive at the ApEntryPoint
>>>>> routine
>>>>>      //
>>>>> -  MicroSecondDelay (100 * 1000);
>>>>> +  MicroSecondDelay (10 * 100 * 1000);
>>>>>
>>>>>      return EFI_SUCCESS;
>>>>>    }
>>>>>
>>>>> Janusz, could you please check this instead? You can switch to your
>>>>> previous kernel to do this test.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Ok, now first time when I started VM I was able to start system
>>>> successfully. When I turned it off and started it again, it
>>>> restarted my
>>>> vm at system boot couple of times. Sometimes I also get very high cpu
>>>> usage for no reason. Also, I get less fps in GTA 5 than in kernel
>>>> 4.1, I
>>>> get something like 30-55, but on 4.1 I get all the time 60 fps.
>>>> This is
>>>> my new log: https://bpaste.net/show/61a122ad7fe5
>>>>
>>>
>>> Just confirm: the Qemu internal error did not appear any more, right?
>> Yes, when I reverted your first patch, switched to -vga std from -vga
>> none and didn't passthrough my GPU (case when I got this internal
>> error), vm started without problem. I even didn't get any VM restarts
>> like with passthrough
>>
>
> Wow, it seems we have fixed the QEMU internal error now. :)
>
> Recurrently, Paolo has reverted some MTRR patches, was your test
> based on these reverted patches?
>
> The GPU passthrough issue may be related to vfio (not sure), Alex, do
> you have any idea?
>
> Laszlo, could you please check the root case is reasonable and fix it in
> OVMF if it's right?
>
> BTW, OVMF handles #UD with no trace - nothing is killed, and no call
> trace
> in the debug input...
>
Yes, reverted MTRR code is already in kernel I use - 4.3-r5+

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-15  7:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-18  9:37 [edk2] KVM: MTRR: fix memory type handling if MTRR is completely disabled Janusz
2015-09-18 10:07 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-09-18 17:48   ` Janusz
2015-09-21  2:51     ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-09-21  3:30       ` Wanpeng Li
2015-09-21  3:40         ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-01 14:12           ` Janusz
2015-10-01 14:18             ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-02 14:38               ` Janusz
2015-10-10 20:07                 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-12 18:20                   ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-12 18:29                     ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-14  3:58                 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-14  7:37                   ` Janusz
2015-10-14  8:24                     ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-14  8:32                       ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-14  9:13                         ` Janusz
2015-10-14  9:16                           ` Janusz
2015-10-14  9:47                         ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-15  3:59                           ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-14 18:08                         ` Janusz
2015-10-15  4:19                           ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-15  6:19                             ` Janusz
2015-10-15  6:41                               ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-15  6:58                                 ` Janusz
2015-10-15  7:10                                   ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-15  7:21                                     ` Janusz [this message]
2015-10-15 16:18                                     ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-15 16:53                                       ` Kinney, Michael D
2015-10-15 18:46                                         ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-20 17:27                                           ` Janusz
2015-10-20 17:44                                             ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-20 18:52                                               ` Janusz Mocek
     [not found]                                       ` <5620696F.7050406@linux.intel.com>
2015-10-16 18:22                                         ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-09-21  8:23       ` Janusz
2015-09-22  8:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-09-22 10:29   ` Janusz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=561F53FD.7070303@gmail.com \
    --to=januszmk6@gmail.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=edk2-devel@ml01.01.org \
    --cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).