kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Janusz <januszmk6@gmail.com>,
	"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
	Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Justen, Jordan L" <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
	"edk2-devel@ml01.01.org" <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Chen Fan <chen.fan.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2] KVM: MTRR: fix memory type handling if MTRR is completely disabled
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 19:44:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56267D99.2080900@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5626797C.2020108@gmail.com>

Hi,

On 10/20/15 19:27, Janusz wrote:
> W dniu 15.10.2015 o 20:46, Laszlo Ersek pisze:
>> On 10/15/15 18:53, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
>>> Laszlo,
>>>
>>> There is already a PCD for this timeout that is used by CpuMpPei.
>>>
>>> 	gUefiCpuPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds
>>>
>>> I noticed that CpuDxe is using a hard coded AP timeout.  I think we should just use this same PCD for both the PEI and DXE CPU module and then set it for OVMF to the compatible value.
>> Perfect, thank you!
>>
>> (I notice the default in the DEC file is 50000, which is half of what
>> the DXE driver hardcodes.)
>>
>> Now we only need a recommended (or experimental) value for it, and an
>> explanation why 100*1000 is no longer sufficient on KVM :)
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Laszlo
>>
>>
>>
> Laszlo,
> 
> I saw that there is already some change in ovmf for MicroSecondDelay
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/commit/1e410eadd80c328e66868263b3006a274ce81ae0
> Is that a fix for it? Because I tried it and it still doesn't work for
> me: https://bpaste.net/show/2514b51bf41f
> I still get internal error

I think you guys are now "mature enough OVMF users" to start employing
the correct terminology.

"edk2" (also spelled as "EDK II") is: "a modern, feature-rich,
cross-platform firmware development environment for the UEFI and PI
specifications".

The source tree contains a whole bunch of modules (drivers,
applications, libraries), organized into packages.

"OVMF" usually denotes a firmware binary built from one of the
OvmfPkg/OvmfPkg*.dsc "platform description files". Think of them as "top
level makefiles". The difference between them is the target architecture
(there's Ia32, X64, and Ia32X64 -- the last one means that the SEC and
PEI phases are 32-bit, whereas the DXE and later phases are 64-bit.) In
practice you'll only care about full X64.

Now, each of OvmfPkg/OvmfPkg*.dsc builds the following three kinds of
modules into the final binary:
- platform-independent modules from various top-level packages
- platform- (ie. Ia32/X64-) dependent modules from various top-level
  packages
- modules from under OvmfPkg that are specific to QEMU/KVM (and Xen, if
  you happen to use OVMF with Xen)

Now, when you reference a commit like 1e410ead above, you can look at
the diffstat, and decide if it is OvmfPkg-specific (third category
above) or not. Here you see UefiCpuPkg, which happens to be the second
category.

The important point is: please do *not* call any and all edk2 patches
"OVMF changes", indiscriminately. That's super confusing for people who
understand the above distinctions. Which now you do too. :)

Let me add that in edk2, patches that straddle top level packages are
generally forbidden -- you can't have a patch that modifies OvmfPkg and
UefiCpuPkg at the same time, modulo *very* rare exceptions. If a feature
or bugfix needs to touch several top-level packages, the series must be
built up carefully in stages.

Knowing all of the above, you can tell that the patch you referenced had
only *enabled* OvmfPkg to customize UefiCpuPkg, via
"PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds". But for that customization to occur
actually, a small patch for OvmfPkg will be necessary too, in order to
set "PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds" differently from the default.

I plan to send that patch soon. If you'd like to be CC'd, that's great
(reporting back with a Tested-by is even better!), but I'll need your
real name for that. (Or any name that looks like a real name.)

Thanks!
Laszlo

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-20 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-18  9:37 [edk2] KVM: MTRR: fix memory type handling if MTRR is completely disabled Janusz
2015-09-18 10:07 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-09-18 17:48   ` Janusz
2015-09-21  2:51     ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-09-21  3:30       ` Wanpeng Li
2015-09-21  3:40         ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-01 14:12           ` Janusz
2015-10-01 14:18             ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-02 14:38               ` Janusz
2015-10-10 20:07                 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-12 18:20                   ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-12 18:29                     ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-14  3:58                 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-14  7:37                   ` Janusz
2015-10-14  8:24                     ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-14  8:32                       ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-14  9:13                         ` Janusz
2015-10-14  9:16                           ` Janusz
2015-10-14  9:47                         ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-15  3:59                           ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-14 18:08                         ` Janusz
2015-10-15  4:19                           ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-15  6:19                             ` Janusz
2015-10-15  6:41                               ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-15  6:58                                 ` Janusz
2015-10-15  7:10                                   ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-15  7:21                                     ` Janusz
2015-10-15 16:18                                     ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-15 16:53                                       ` Kinney, Michael D
2015-10-15 18:46                                         ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-20 17:27                                           ` Janusz
2015-10-20 17:44                                             ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2015-10-20 18:52                                               ` Janusz Mocek
     [not found]                                       ` <5620696F.7050406@linux.intel.com>
2015-10-16 18:22                                         ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-09-21  8:23       ` Janusz
2015-09-22  8:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-09-22 10:29   ` Janusz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56267D99.2080900@redhat.com \
    --to=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=chen.fan.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=edk2-devel@ml01.01.org \
    --cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=januszmk6@gmail.com \
    --cc=jordan.l.justen@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.d.kinney@intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).