From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Janusz <januszmk6@gmail.com>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Justen, Jordan L" <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
"edk2-devel@ml01.01.org" <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Chen Fan <chen.fan.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2] KVM: MTRR: fix memory type handling if MTRR is completely disabled
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 19:44:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56267D99.2080900@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5626797C.2020108@gmail.com>
Hi,
On 10/20/15 19:27, Janusz wrote:
> W dniu 15.10.2015 o 20:46, Laszlo Ersek pisze:
>> On 10/15/15 18:53, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
>>> Laszlo,
>>>
>>> There is already a PCD for this timeout that is used by CpuMpPei.
>>>
>>> gUefiCpuPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds
>>>
>>> I noticed that CpuDxe is using a hard coded AP timeout. I think we should just use this same PCD for both the PEI and DXE CPU module and then set it for OVMF to the compatible value.
>> Perfect, thank you!
>>
>> (I notice the default in the DEC file is 50000, which is half of what
>> the DXE driver hardcodes.)
>>
>> Now we only need a recommended (or experimental) value for it, and an
>> explanation why 100*1000 is no longer sufficient on KVM :)
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Laszlo
>>
>>
>>
> Laszlo,
>
> I saw that there is already some change in ovmf for MicroSecondDelay
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/commit/1e410eadd80c328e66868263b3006a274ce81ae0
> Is that a fix for it? Because I tried it and it still doesn't work for
> me: https://bpaste.net/show/2514b51bf41f
> I still get internal error
I think you guys are now "mature enough OVMF users" to start employing
the correct terminology.
"edk2" (also spelled as "EDK II") is: "a modern, feature-rich,
cross-platform firmware development environment for the UEFI and PI
specifications".
The source tree contains a whole bunch of modules (drivers,
applications, libraries), organized into packages.
"OVMF" usually denotes a firmware binary built from one of the
OvmfPkg/OvmfPkg*.dsc "platform description files". Think of them as "top
level makefiles". The difference between them is the target architecture
(there's Ia32, X64, and Ia32X64 -- the last one means that the SEC and
PEI phases are 32-bit, whereas the DXE and later phases are 64-bit.) In
practice you'll only care about full X64.
Now, each of OvmfPkg/OvmfPkg*.dsc builds the following three kinds of
modules into the final binary:
- platform-independent modules from various top-level packages
- platform- (ie. Ia32/X64-) dependent modules from various top-level
packages
- modules from under OvmfPkg that are specific to QEMU/KVM (and Xen, if
you happen to use OVMF with Xen)
Now, when you reference a commit like 1e410ead above, you can look at
the diffstat, and decide if it is OvmfPkg-specific (third category
above) or not. Here you see UefiCpuPkg, which happens to be the second
category.
The important point is: please do *not* call any and all edk2 patches
"OVMF changes", indiscriminately. That's super confusing for people who
understand the above distinctions. Which now you do too. :)
Let me add that in edk2, patches that straddle top level packages are
generally forbidden -- you can't have a patch that modifies OvmfPkg and
UefiCpuPkg at the same time, modulo *very* rare exceptions. If a feature
or bugfix needs to touch several top-level packages, the series must be
built up carefully in stages.
Knowing all of the above, you can tell that the patch you referenced had
only *enabled* OvmfPkg to customize UefiCpuPkg, via
"PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds". But for that customization to occur
actually, a small patch for OvmfPkg will be necessary too, in order to
set "PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds" differently from the default.
I plan to send that patch soon. If you'd like to be CC'd, that's great
(reporting back with a Tested-by is even better!), but I'll need your
real name for that. (Or any name that looks like a real name.)
Thanks!
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-20 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-18 9:37 [edk2] KVM: MTRR: fix memory type handling if MTRR is completely disabled Janusz
2015-09-18 10:07 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-09-18 17:48 ` Janusz
2015-09-21 2:51 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-09-21 3:30 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-09-21 3:40 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-01 14:12 ` Janusz
2015-10-01 14:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-02 14:38 ` Janusz
2015-10-10 20:07 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-12 18:20 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-12 18:29 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-14 3:58 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-14 7:37 ` Janusz
2015-10-14 8:24 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-14 8:32 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-14 9:13 ` Janusz
2015-10-14 9:16 ` Janusz
2015-10-14 9:47 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-15 3:59 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-14 18:08 ` Janusz
2015-10-15 4:19 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-15 6:19 ` Janusz
2015-10-15 6:41 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-15 6:58 ` Janusz
2015-10-15 7:10 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-10-15 7:21 ` Janusz
2015-10-15 16:18 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-15 16:53 ` Kinney, Michael D
2015-10-15 18:46 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-10-20 17:27 ` Janusz
2015-10-20 17:44 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2015-10-20 18:52 ` Janusz Mocek
[not found] ` <5620696F.7050406@linux.intel.com>
2015-10-16 18:22 ` Laszlo Ersek
2015-09-21 8:23 ` Janusz
2015-09-22 8:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-09-22 10:29 ` Janusz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56267D99.2080900@redhat.com \
--to=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=chen.fan.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=edk2-devel@ml01.01.org \
--cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=januszmk6@gmail.com \
--cc=jordan.l.justen@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.d.kinney@intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).