From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/7] linux-headers/kvm: add Hyper-V SynIC irq
 routing type and struct
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:40:54 +0100
Message-ID: <562E4986.4070605@redhat.com>
References: <1445853060-24201-1-git-send-email-asmetanin@virtuozzo.com>
 <1445853060-24201-4-git-send-email-asmetanin@virtuozzo.com>
 <CAFEAcA9_DwrMd7LhLxxxxt307pFY46fFYDXbhbRN7YDmOOFaWw@mail.gmail.com>
 <562DFC9B.4050204@openvz.org>
 <CAFEAcA_SwJvN8E_6fCawJnwqM3RaB94XGn9TkU7f2VPg40uo-g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Andrey Smetanin <asmetanin@virtuozzo.com>,
	QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
	"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Roman Kagan <rkagan@virtuozzo.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com ([209.85.220.54]:35016 "EHLO
	mail-pa0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751108AbbJZPlB (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:41:01 -0400
Received: by pasz6 with SMTP id z6so191662306pas.2
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 08:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_SwJvN8E_6fCawJnwqM3RaB94XGn9TkU7f2VPg40uo-g@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>



On 26/10/2015 11:16, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 26 October 2015 at 10:12, Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> wrote:
>> On 10/26/2015 01:03 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> Hi. Changes to linux-headers/ should only be made as part of
>>> an automated update from a mainline Linux kernel tree using
>>> the scripts/update-linux-headers.sh script. This patch looks
>>> like maybe it was a manual edit ?
> 
>> yep. We know and have discussed this with Paolo already.
>> Kernel stuff is in progress at the moment. The patch
>> is presented to interested people to allow to compile and
>> run.
>>
>> Actual merge will be performed with proper sync
>> when kernel will be in rc3 or 4 stage and the patch will be
>> dropped.
> 
> OK, cool. It's best to tag the series as 'RFC' rather than
> 'PATCH' in that case, as a reminder that it can't be applied
> just yet.

I'm still going to apply it to a branch for now, so it's not strictly
RFC.  I'm not sending a pull request, however, until I rebase the
branch, and then it will just go away.

Paolo