From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] VFIO: Add a parameter to force nonthread IRQ Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 10:17:34 +0100 Message-ID: <56372A2E.6050805@redhat.com> References: <1445908801-14732-1-git-send-email-yunhong.jiang@linux.intel.com> <1445917034.8018.220.camel@redhat.com> <20151027063501.GA22054@jnakajim-build> <562F43F8.1040101@redhat.com> <20151027212648.GA22916@jnakajim-build> <56301A87.9030907@redhat.com> <1446048028.8018.387.camel@redhat.com> <5631003C.1050508@redhat.com> <1446088263.8018.435.camel@redhat.com> <5631EAC8.1080805@redhat.com> <20151030061646.GA18979@jnakajim-build> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alex Williamson , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti To: Yunhong Jiang Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151030061646.GA18979@jnakajim-build> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 30/10/2015 07:16, Yunhong Jiang wrote: > And with this change, we even don't need the module option anymore, we first > try the primary handler, which is in hard irq context, and if failed, then > threaded irq handler. Am I right? Yes. > Paolo/Alex, do you want to work on the patch yourself? If not, I will be > happy to try this method. Of course you can do it yourself. Thanks! Paolo