From: Mario Smarduch <m.smarduch@samsung.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM/arm: kernel low level debug support for ARM32 virtual platforms
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:28:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <563A94A2.3010307@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu8GJgzv82fVfCU7VQB2_ckRkzUYcQOx51rT2WgnmO_fsw@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/4/2015 10:51 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 4 November 2015 at 19:49, Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> On 11/04/2015 08:31 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 01:39:44PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Mario Smarduch <m.smarduch@samsung.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 11/3/2015 9:55 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 09:44:52AM -0800, Mario Smarduch wrote:
>>>>>>> On 11/3/2015 8:33 AM, Christopher Covington wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 11/02/2015 06:51 PM, Mario Smarduch wrote:
>>>>>>>>> this is a re-post from couple weeks ago, please take time to review this
>>>>>>>>> simple patch which simplifies DEBUG_LL and prevents kernel crash on virtual
>>>>>>>>> platforms.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Before this patch DEBUG_LL for 'dummy virtual machine':
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ( ) Kernel low-level debugging via EmbeddedICE DCC channel
>>>>>>>>> ( ) Kernel low-level debug output via semihosting I/O
>>>>>>>>> ( ) Kernel low-level debugging via 8250 UART
>>>>>>>>> ( ) Kernel low-level debugging via ARM Ltd PL01x Primecell
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In summary if debug uart is not emulated kernel crashes.
>>>>>>>>> And once you pass that hurdle, uart physical/virtual addresses are unknown.
>>>>>>>>> DEBUG_LL comes in handy on many occasions and should be somewhat
>>>>>>>>> intuitive to use like it is for physical platforms. For virtual platforms
>>>>>>>>> user may start daubting the host and get into a bigger mess.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> After this patch is applied user gets:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (X) Kernel low-level debugging on QEMU Virtual Platform
>>>>>>>>> ( ) Kernel low-level debugging on Kvmtool Virtual Platform
>>>>>>>>> ..... above repeated ....
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The virtual addresses selected follow arm reference models, high in vmalloc
>>>>>>>>> section with high mem enabled and guest running with >= 1GB of memory. The
>>>>>>>>> offset is leftover from arm reference models.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Which model? It doesn't appear to match the vexpress AEM/RTSM/FVP/whatever
>>>>>>>> which used 0x1c090000 for UART0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I recall QEMU virt model had it's own physical address map, for sure I saw the
>>>>>>> virtio-mmio regions assigned in some ARM document. Peter would you know?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As far as kvmtool I'm not sure, currently PC1 COM1 port is used? Andre will that
>>>>>>> stay fixed?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We make absolutely no guarantees about the memory map provided by kvmtool.
>>>>>
>>>>> If that's also the case for qemu, then I guess the best you can do is find a way
>>>>> to dump the device tree. Find the uart, physical address and try figure out the
>>>>> virtual address.
>>>>>
>>>>> Pretty involved, hoped for something more automated since that's a handy feature.
>>>>
>>>> You really only need LL_DEBUG now if you are debugging very early code
>>>> before memory is setup and/or bad memory. Use earlycon instead which
>>>> should already be supported both via the pl011 or semihosting. I used
>>>> it with QEMU semihosting support.
>>>>
>>> Then we should really document how to use that with qemu's virt platform
>>> and kvmtool's platform on both 32-bit and 64-bit so that users can
>>> easily figure out what they're doing wrong when they get no output.
>>>
>>> In practice, the address for the pl011 is quite unlikely to change, I
>>> dare speculate, so that documentation shouldn't need frequent updating.
>>
>> Is it not on by default since the following change?
>>
>> http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commitdiff;h=f022b8e95379b0433d13509706b66f38fc15dde8
>>
>
> Yes, but it still requires the plain 'earlycon' argument (i.e, without
> '=pl011,...') to be passed on the kernel command line if you want
> early output.
>
I spent time debugging 'earlycon' for pl011, ironically using DEBUG_LL, from the
looks of it no mmio uart should work for armv7. It appears earlycon_map()
requires a fixed mapping similar to arm64.
Comparing both options, DEBUG_LL takes you from kernel decompress code to early
FDT parsing. A lot of early_print() calls won't work if DEBUG_LL is not enabled
including dump_machine_table which ends in a endless loop. IMO it's worth
turning this option on for that and other reasons.
'earlycon' is enabled some ways up in setup_arch().
As far as the patch, providing a hint to the user with probable uart addresses
would help and in the worst case "see the latest device tree for the virtual
platform".
- Mario
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-04 23:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-02 23:51 [PATCH] KVM/arm: kernel low level debug support for ARM32 virtual platforms Mario Smarduch
2015-11-03 16:33 ` Christopher Covington
2015-11-03 17:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-03 17:44 ` Mario Smarduch
2015-11-03 17:55 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-03 19:17 ` Mario Smarduch
2015-11-03 19:39 ` Rob Herring
2015-11-04 13:31 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-11-04 18:49 ` Christopher Covington
2015-11-04 18:51 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-04 23:28 ` Mario Smarduch [this message]
2015-11-05 1:13 ` Peter Hurley
2015-11-05 15:04 ` Christoffer Dall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=563A94A2.3010307@samsung.com \
--to=m.smarduch@samsung.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).