kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] KVM: x86: MMU: Consolidate WARN_ON/BUG_ON checks for reverse-mapped sptes
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:18:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5641B659.3090903@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5641B350.5070705@lab.ntt.co.jp>



On 10/11/2015 10:05, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> 
> 
>> BTW, on my todo list is to change the rmap items to a struct (with a
>> single u64 inside) for type safety.  Since you are touching this code,
>> perhaps you can give it a shot?
> 
> Yes, almost done here (assuming that you mean 'unsigned long').

Yes, thanks!

> But I have some candidates for its name in mind:
> 
> 1. struct kvm_rmap { unsigned long val; };
> 2. struct kvm_rmap_head { unsigned long val; };
> 3. struct kvm_rmap_list_head { unsigned long val; };
> 4. struct kvm_spte_list_head { unsigned long val; };
> 
> Since this is the head of the reverse mapping list of sptes, I thought
> name 3 might be the best and first made a patch with it, but it was
> a bit longer than I had hoped it to be.
> 
> I have changed it to name 2, and it looks a bit nicer now, but even
> shorter, e.g. name 1, may be good as well.
> 
> Do you have any preference?

I like kvm_rmap_head.

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-10  9:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-06  7:20 [PATCH 0/5] KVM: x86: MMU: Clean up x86's mmu code for future work Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-06  7:21 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: x86: MMU: Remove unused parameter of __direct_map() Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-06  7:22 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: x86: MMU: Add helper function to clear a bit in unsync child bitmap Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-06  7:23 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: x86: MMU: Make mmu_set_spte() return emulate value Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-06  7:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: x86: MMU: Remove is_rmap_spte() and use is_shadow_present_pte() Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-06  7:25 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: x86: MMU: Consolidate WARN_ON/BUG_ON checks for reverse-mapped sptes Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-09 10:14   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-10  9:05     ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-10  9:18       ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-11-09 10:15 ` [PATCH 0/5] KVM: x86: MMU: Clean up x86's mmu code for future work Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5641B659.3090903@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).