From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Estrada, Zachary J" Subject: Is kvm-kmod still supported? Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 16:09:27 -0600 Message-ID: <5681B317.10403@illinois.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Return-path: Received: from pps03.cites.illinois.edu ([192.17.82.70]:44242 "EHLO pps03.cites.illinois.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752469AbbL1WJe (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:09:34 -0500 Received: from cex1312.ad.uillinois.edu (cex1312.cites.illinois.edu [64.22.177.39]) by pps03.cites.illinois.edu (8.15.0.59/8.15.0.59) with ESMTPS id tBSM9XQs029233 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 16:09:33 -0600 Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I've been maintaining a fork for research and tinkering. Is the kvm-kmod standalone module still supported or should I be using the full Linux tree? I find kvm-kmod convenient to keep the source independent of the kernel tree, but I also want to be using the latest and greatest. The repository I'm referring to is here: http://git.kiszka.org/?p=kvm-kmod.git;a=summary However, the "next" branch appears to be out of sync with the latest upstream in the Linux tree. Thanks so much! --Zak