From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: QUESTION: mmu.gva_to_gpa versus nested_mmu.gva_to_gpa
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 09:36:36 +0100
Message-ID: <56839794.3000101@redhat.com>
References: <CALzav=fY9Gbv7WTeTvd4P_xLiFj=bnAQpvCUFdXMbFJ73Y5ZoA@mail.gmail.com>
 <5681C4E9.9090503@redhat.com>
 <CALzav=f6R2kYV7JH3B5SD6D4ccWP9JHMa-fjirfq2SSkMQ2oHw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:38240 "EHLO
	mail-wm0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751994AbbL3Igl (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 30 Dec 2015 03:36:41 -0500
Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id b14so40507926wmb.1
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 00:36:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CALzav=f6R2kYV7JH3B5SD6D4ccWP9JHMa-fjirfq2SSkMQ2oHw@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>



On 29/12/2015 17:37, David Matlack wrote:
>> > Yes, it's correct.

s/it's/you're/ :)

Paolo