public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/5] s390x: uv-guest: add share bit test
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 09:16:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <569159d8-217c-69ea-5978-628ceb4fa013@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220222145456.9956-5-seiden@linux.ibm.com>

On 2/22/22 15:54, Steffen Eiden wrote:
> The UV facility bits shared/unshared must both be set or none.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>

> ---
>   s390x/uv-guest.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/s390x/uv-guest.c b/s390x/uv-guest.c
> index 728c60aa..77057bd2 100644
> --- a/s390x/uv-guest.c
> +++ b/s390x/uv-guest.c
> @@ -159,6 +159,14 @@ static void test_invalid(void)
>   	report_prefix_pop();
>   }
>   
> +static void test_share_bits(void)
> +{
> +	bool unshare = uv_query_test_call(BIT_UVC_CMD_REMOVE_SHARED_ACCESS);
> +	bool share = uv_query_test_call(BIT_UVC_CMD_SET_SHARED_ACCESS);
> +
> +	report(!(share ^ unshare), "share bits");
> +}
> +
>   int main(void)
>   {
>   	bool has_uvc = test_facility(158);
> @@ -169,6 +177,12 @@ int main(void)
>   		goto done;
>   	}
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * Needs to be done before the guest-fence,
> +	 * as the fence tests if both shared bits are present
> +	 */
> +	test_share_bits();
> +
>   	if (!uv_os_is_guest()) {
>   		report_skip("Not a protected guest");
>   		goto done;


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-23  8:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-22 14:54 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/5] s390x: Attestation tests Steffen Eiden
2022-02-22 14:54 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/5] s390x: uv-host: Add attestation test Steffen Eiden
2022-03-23  8:18   ` Janosch Frank
2022-02-22 14:54 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/5] s390x: lib: Add QUI getter Steffen Eiden
2022-02-23 15:37   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-03-23  8:07   ` Janosch Frank
2022-02-22 14:54 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 3/5] s390x: uv-guest: remove duplicated checks Steffen Eiden
2022-02-22 14:54 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/5] s390x: uv-guest: add share bit test Steffen Eiden
2022-02-23 15:36   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-03-23  8:16   ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2022-02-22 14:54 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 5/5] s390x: uv-guest: Add attestation tests Steffen Eiden
2022-02-23 15:48   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-03-23  8:39   ` Janosch Frank
2022-03-23 10:07     ` Claudio Imbrenda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=569159d8-217c-69ea-5978-628ceb4fa013@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox