From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/21] arm64: KVM: VHE: Patch out use of HVC Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 17:28:32 +0000 Message-ID: <56AF95C0.3080006@arm.com> References: <1453737235-16522-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <1453737235-16522-7-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <20160201131634.GI1478@cbox> <56AF5ED8.7010303@arm.com> <20160201153635.GH15514@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <56AF85D8.7080907@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: KVM devel mailing list , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" To: Ard Biesheuvel Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 01/02/16 17:08, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 1 February 2016 at 17:20, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> On 01/02/16 15:36, Catalin Marinas wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 01:34:16PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>>> On 01/02/16 13:16, Christoffer Dall wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:53:40PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S >>>>>> index 93e8d983..9e0683f 100644 >>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S >>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/hyp-entry.S >>>>>> @@ -38,6 +38,32 @@ >>>>>> ldp x0, x1, [sp], #16 >>>>>> .endm >>>>>> >>>>>> +.macro do_el2_call >>>>>> + /* >>>>>> + * Shuffle the parameters before calling the function >>>>>> + * pointed to in x0. Assumes parameters in x[1,2,3]. >>>>>> + */ >>>>>> + stp lr, xzr, [sp, #-16]! >>>>> >>>>> remind me why this pair isn't just doing "str" instead of "stp" with the >>>>> xzr ? >>>> >>>> Because SP has to be aligned on a 16 bytes boundary at all times. >>> >>> You could do something like: >>> >>> sub sp, sp, #16 >>> str lr, [sp] >>> >> >> Ah, fair enough. I'll fold that in. >> > > Since we're micro-reviewing: what's wrong with > > str lr, [sp, #-16]! > > ? > I suspect that on most micro-architectures, a register writeback is going to be slower than doing the sub independently. I may be wrong, though. M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...