From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 00/14] ppc64: initial drop Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 13:36:52 +0100 Message-ID: <56BC8064.5050705@redhat.com> References: <1454957594-30601-1-git-send-email-drjones@redhat.com> <56BB48BD.2040305@redhat.com> <20160211115628.tbuynqogtw63tpkw@hawk.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, thuth@redhat.com, dgibson@redhat.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, agraf@suse.de, lvivier@redhat.com To: Andrew Jones Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57876 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751313AbcBKMg6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2016 07:36:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160211115628.tbuynqogtw63tpkw@hawk.localdomain> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/02/2016 12:56, Andrew Jones wrote: > > So, how should we proceed? I propose to > 1) Wait for some more reviews (some r-b's would be nice to add) > 2) I'll remove the zero-size files and fix anything else brought up, > then post a v3. > Then > 3) Q: Should we wait until the debug-exit hack has been replaced with > something better? Or could we commit it as a starter (I believe > it may already even be a useful framework for hypercall testing. Yes, I think we want it for now. Remove the "HACK" even; as long as it's a PPC-only thing it's fine. Paolo > Something Thomas wants to use it for now.)