From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
tchalamarla@caviumnetworks.com
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: Configure TCR_EL2.PS at runtime
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 13:55:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56BC92C1.8060201@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160211133401.GV5171@cbox>
On 11/02/16 13:34, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 02:27:08PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:46:53AM -0800, tchalamarla@caviumnetworks.com wrote:
>>> From: Tirumalesh Chalamarla <tchalamarla@caviumnetworks.com>
>>>
>>> Setting TCR_EL2.PS to 40 bits is wrong on systems with PS size is
>>> less than 40 bits. and with systems where RAM is at higher address,
>>> this will break KVM.
>>>
>>> This patch sets TCR_EL2.PS at runtime similar to VTCR_EL2.PS
>>>
>>> changes form V2:
>>> - Modified subject line and commit message.
>>> - Removed TCR_EL2_FLAGS.
>>>
>>> changes from V1:
>>> - Moved to dynamic configuration.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tirumalesh Chalamarla <tchalamarla@caviumnetworks.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h | 2 --
>>> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp-init.S | 12 +++++++-----
>>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
>>> index 738a95f..3776db0 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
>>> @@ -107,8 +107,6 @@
>>> #define TCR_EL2_MASK (TCR_EL2_TG0 | TCR_EL2_SH0 | \
>>> TCR_EL2_ORGN0 | TCR_EL2_IRGN0 | TCR_EL2_T0SZ)
>>>
>>> -#define TCR_EL2_FLAGS (TCR_EL2_RES1 | TCR_EL2_PS_40B)
>>> -
>>> /* VTCR_EL2 Registers bits */
>>> #define VTCR_EL2_RES1 (1 << 31)
>>> #define VTCR_EL2_PS_MASK (7 << 16)
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp-init.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp-init.S
>>> index 3e568dc..b5ab1b0 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp-init.S
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp-init.S
>>> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ __do_hyp_init:
>>> mrs x4, tcr_el1
>>> ldr x5, =TCR_EL2_MASK
>>> and x4, x4, x5
>>> - ldr x5, =TCR_EL2_FLAGS
>>> + ldr x5, =TCR_EL2_RES1
>>> orr x4, x4, x5
>>>
>>> #ifndef CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS_48
>>> @@ -85,15 +85,17 @@ __do_hyp_init:
>>> ldr_l x5, idmap_t0sz
>>> bfi x4, x5, TCR_T0SZ_OFFSET, TCR_TxSZ_WIDTH
>>> #endif
>>> - msr tcr_el2, x4
>>> -
>>> - ldr x4, =VTCR_EL2_FLAGS
>>> /*
>>> * Read the PARange bits from ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1 and set the PS bits in
>>> - * VTCR_EL2.
>>> + * TCR_EL2 and VTCR_EL2.
>>> */
>>> mrs x5, ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1
>>> bfi x4, x5, #16, #3
>>> +
>>> + msr tcr_el2, x4
>>> +
>>> + ldr x4, =VTCR_EL2_FLAGS
>>> + bfi x4, x5, #16, #3
>>> /*
>>> * Read the VMIDBits bits from ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1 and set the VS bit in
>>> * VTCR_EL2.
>>> --
>>> 2.1.0
>>>
>>
>> This looks reasonable enough for me. Did we limit Linux to PS=40 bits
>> in the past and have lifted this restriction, or why did we have this
>> limitation for EL2 translations in the past?
>>
> Hmm, just went back and looked at my comments [1] on Suzuki's 16K page
> series, and regarding our stage-2 page table configuration I wrote this:
>
> <quote>
> ... the constraints of
> this whole thing is, and make sure we agree on this:
>
> 1. We fix the IPA max width to 40 bits
> 2. We don't support systems with a PARange smaller than 40 bits (do we
> check this anywhere or document this anywhere?)
> 3. We always assume we are running on a system with PARange of 40
> bits
> and we are therefore constrained to use concatination.
> </quote>
>
> So this change is actually making a bit nervous... Marc, did you check
> if all the stuff in arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h still holds after
> we relax this?
I believe this still works for the following reasons:
- This only affects the output address of EL2 Stage-1, and basically
only allows EL2 to reach the same memory as the rest of the host kernel.
- Stage-2 translation already does the same thing, for similar reasons.
- We enforce 40bit IPA by not providing page tables above 40 bits (by
setting T0SZ to 64-40=24). This has the effect of denying accesses above
40bit IPA to the guest.
So I'm quite confident that we're safe here.
Thoughts?
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-11 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-10 18:46 [PATCH] arm64: KVM: Configure TCR_EL2.PS at runtime tchalamarla
2016-02-11 13:27 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-11 13:34 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-11 13:55 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2016-02-11 14:41 ` Christoffer Dall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56BC92C1.8060201@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=tchalamarla@caviumnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).