From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 00/18] KVM: s390: Fixes and features for kvm/next (4.6) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:18:42 +0100 Message-ID: <56BE05E2.8060101@redhat.com> References: <1455283382-62999-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <56BDFF66.6080003@redhat.com> <56BE0037.6090505@de.ibm.com> <56BE01A3.4020801@redhat.com> <56BE0397.5030901@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: KVM , linux-s390 , Cornelia Huck , Jens Freimann , Alexander Graf To: Christian Borntraeger Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36200 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751484AbcBLQSr (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2016 11:18:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <56BE0397.5030901@de.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/02/2016 17:08, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>> I need one patch for 4.4 as well (vs. 3 patches against 4.5-rc3). So bisect is broken >>> on 4.4 as well, I just had it fixed earlier. >> >> If these three patches are in Linus's tree, just send the pull request >> against that. It's okay if a submaintainer pull request brings back a >> few more commits from Linus's tree. > > Not yet in Linus tree (cgroup-fixes mostly) As long as the bugs only surface with libvirt, I guess that's acceptable. Paolo