From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 00/18] KVM: s390: Fixes and features for kvm/next (4.6) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 23:25:40 +0100 Message-ID: <56BE5BE4.9090804@redhat.com> References: <1455283382-62999-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <56BDFF66.6080003@redhat.com> <56BE0037.6090505@de.ibm.com> <56BE01A3.4020801@redhat.com> <56BE0397.5030901@de.ibm.com> <56BE05E2.8060101@redhat.com> <56BE332F.6060005@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: KVM , linux-s390 , Cornelia Huck , Jens Freimann , Alexander Graf To: Christian Borntraeger Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44801 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751447AbcBLWZq (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <56BE332F.6060005@de.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/02/2016 20:31, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 02/12/2016 05:18 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >> >> On 12/02/2016 17:08, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>>>> I need one patch for 4.4 as well (vs. 3 patches against 4.5-rc3). So bisect is broken >>>>> on 4.4 as well, I just had it fixed earlier. >>>> >>>> If these three patches are in Linus's tree, just send the pull request >>>> against that. It's okay if a submaintainer pull request brings back a >>>> few more commits from Linus's tree. >>> >>> Not yet in Linus tree (cgroup-fixes mostly) >> >> As long as the bugs only surface with libvirt, I guess that's acceptable. > > If disabling the cpuset controller in libvirt + disabling thp is considered > ok for bisecting, then you can go ahead and pull. Well, certainly not optimal but feasible. > Otherwise I can wait for > the cgroup fix tree to be pulled and then rebase. Ok, then I'll pull it and add a note in the merge commit to Linus. Paolo