From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Xiao Guangrong Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] acpi: add aml_concatenate() Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:32:45 +0800 Message-ID: <56C1A94D.2060500@linux.intel.com> References: <1452624610-46945-1-git-send-email-guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com> <1452624610-46945-5-git-send-email-guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com> <20160208115103.00dc44db@nial.brq.redhat.com> <56C01635.6090501@linux.intel.com> <56C016CC.5090007@linux.intel.com> <20160215100243.703e00da@nial.brq.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, gleb@kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net, ehabkost@redhat.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org To: Igor Mammedov Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:28194 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750925AbcBOKko (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2016 05:40:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160215100243.703e00da@nial.brq.redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/15/2016 05:02 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 13:55:24 +0800 > Xiao Guangrong wrote: > >> On 02/14/2016 01:52 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 02/08/2016 06:51 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote: >>>> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 02:50:03 +0800 >>>> Xiao Guangrong wrote: >>>> >>>>> It will be used by nvdimm acpi >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong >>>>> --- >>>>> hw/acpi/aml-build.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ >>>>> include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h | 1 + >>>>> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c >>>>> index 97c9efb..421dd84 100644 >>>>> --- a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c >>>>> +++ b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c >>>>> @@ -1440,6 +1440,20 @@ Aml *aml_alias(const char *source_object, const char *alias_object) >>>>> return var; >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> +/* ACPI 1.0b: 16.2.5.4 Type 2 Opcodes Encoding: DefConcat */ >>>>> +Aml *aml_concatenate(Aml *source1, Aml *source2, Aml *target) >>>>> +{ >>>>> + Aml *var = aml_opcode(0x73 /* ConcatOp */); >>>>> + aml_append(var, source1); >>>>> + aml_append(var, source2); >>>>> + >>>>> + if (target) { >>>>> + aml_append(var, target); >>>>> + } >>>> target is not an optional, pls looks at aml_add and use >>>> helper to make patch correct and smaller >>>> >>> >>> Indeed, i will change it to: >>> >>> /* ACPI 1.0b: 16.2.5.4 Type 2 Opcodes Encoding: DefConcat */ >>> Aml *aml_concatenate(Aml *source1, Aml *source2, Aml *target) >>> { >>> return build_opcode_2arg_dst(0x73 /* ConcatOp */, arg1, arg2, dst); >>> } >>> >> >> And make a assert for @target to ensure it can not be NULL. > Don't do that, see build_opcode_2arg_dst(), target can be NULL > that allows to express implicit target like: > > aml_add(a, aml_add(b, c, NULL), NULL) > > where one doesn't need an intermediate variable to store result. > Yes, you are right, i re-checked the spec and it said that "Source2 is concatenated to Source1 and the result data is optionally stored into Result" so that @target can be eliminated.