From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
Cc: gleb@kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kai.huang@linux.intel.com,
jike.song@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/11] KVM: MMU: introduce kvm_mmu_gfn_{allow,disallow}_lpage
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 12:09:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C6F7D3.3000205@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455449503-20993-3-git-send-email-guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
On 14/02/2016 12:31, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> Abstract the common operations from account_shadowed() and
> unaccount_shadowed(), then introduce kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage()
> and kvm_mmu_gfn_allow_lpage()
>
> These two functions will be used by page tracking in the later patch
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index de9e992..e1bb66c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -776,21 +776,39 @@ static struct kvm_lpage_info *lpage_info_slot(gfn_t gfn,
> return &slot->arch.lpage_info[level - 2][idx];
> }
>
> +static void update_gfn_disallow_lpage_count(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> + gfn_t gfn, int count)
> +{
> + struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = PT_DIRECTORY_LEVEL; i <= PT_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; ++i) {
> + linfo = lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, i);
> + linfo->disallow_lpage += count;
> + WARN_ON(linfo->disallow_lpage < 0);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
> +{
> + update_gfn_disallow_lpage_count(slot, gfn, 1);
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_mmu_gfn_allow_lpage(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
> +{
> + update_gfn_disallow_lpage_count(slot, gfn, -1);
> +}
> +
> static void account_shadowed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
> {
> struct kvm_memslots *slots;
> struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> - struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo;
> gfn_t gfn;
> - int i;
>
> gfn = sp->gfn;
> slots = kvm_memslots_for_spte_role(kvm, sp->role);
> slot = __gfn_to_memslot(slots, gfn);
> - for (i = PT_DIRECTORY_LEVEL; i <= PT_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; ++i) {
> - linfo = lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, i);
> - linfo->disallow_lpage += 1;
> - }
> + kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(slot, gfn);
> kvm->arch.indirect_shadow_pages++;
> }
>
> @@ -798,18 +816,12 @@ static void unaccount_shadowed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
> {
> struct kvm_memslots *slots;
> struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> - struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo;
> gfn_t gfn;
> - int i;
>
> gfn = sp->gfn;
> slots = kvm_memslots_for_spte_role(kvm, sp->role);
> slot = __gfn_to_memslot(slots, gfn);
> - for (i = PT_DIRECTORY_LEVEL; i <= PT_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; ++i) {
> - linfo = lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, i);
> - linfo->disallow_lpage -= 1;
> - WARN_ON(linfo->disallow_lpage < 0);
> - }
> + kvm_mmu_gfn_allow_lpage(slot, gfn);
> kvm->arch.indirect_shadow_pages--;
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> index 55ffb7b..de92bed 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> @@ -174,4 +174,7 @@ static inline bool permission_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *mmu,
>
> void kvm_mmu_invalidate_zap_all_pages(struct kvm *kvm);
> void kvm_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn_start, gfn_t gfn_end);
> +
> +void kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
> +void kvm_mmu_gfn_allow_lpage(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
> #endif
>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-19 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-14 11:31 [PATCH v3 00/11] KVM: x86: track guest page access Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] KVM: MMU: rename has_wrprotected_page to mmu_gfn_lpage_is_disallowed Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] KVM: MMU: introduce kvm_mmu_gfn_{allow,disallow}_lpage Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:09 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] KVM: MMU: introduce kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] KVM: page track: add the framework of guest page tracking Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23 3:57 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] KVM: page track: introduce kvm_page_track_{add,remove}_page Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23 4:18 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-23 14:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-19 11:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23 4:18 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] KVM: MMU: let page fault handler be aware tracked page Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23 4:19 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] KVM: page track: add notifier support Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23 4:34 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-23 14:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] KVM: MMU: use page track for non-leaf shadow pages Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] KVM: MMU: simplify mmu_need_write_protect Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] KVM: MMU: clear write-flooding on the fast path of tracked page Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23 4:36 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] KVM: MMU: apply page track notifier Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23 4:40 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-23 14:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-19 12:00 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] KVM: x86: track guest page access Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-22 10:05 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-23 3:02 ` Jike Song
2016-02-23 5:44 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-02-23 12:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23 10:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23 11:50 ` Jike Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56C6F7D3.3000205@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jike.song@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).