kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
Cc: gleb@kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kai.huang@linux.intel.com,
	jike.song@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/11] KVM: MMU: introduce kvm_mmu_gfn_{allow,disallow}_lpage
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 12:09:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C6F7D3.3000205@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455449503-20993-3-git-send-email-guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>



On 14/02/2016 12:31, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> Abstract the common operations from account_shadowed() and
> unaccount_shadowed(), then introduce kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage()
> and kvm_mmu_gfn_allow_lpage()
> 
> These two functions will be used by page tracking in the later patch
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h |  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index de9e992..e1bb66c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -776,21 +776,39 @@ static struct kvm_lpage_info *lpage_info_slot(gfn_t gfn,
>  	return &slot->arch.lpage_info[level - 2][idx];
>  }
>  
> +static void update_gfn_disallow_lpage_count(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> +					    gfn_t gfn, int count)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = PT_DIRECTORY_LEVEL; i <= PT_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; ++i) {
> +		linfo = lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, i);
> +		linfo->disallow_lpage += count;
> +		WARN_ON(linfo->disallow_lpage < 0);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
> +{
> +	update_gfn_disallow_lpage_count(slot, gfn, 1);
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_mmu_gfn_allow_lpage(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
> +{
> +	update_gfn_disallow_lpage_count(slot, gfn, -1);
> +}
> +
>  static void account_shadowed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_memslots *slots;
>  	struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> -	struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo;
>  	gfn_t gfn;
> -	int i;
>  
>  	gfn = sp->gfn;
>  	slots = kvm_memslots_for_spte_role(kvm, sp->role);
>  	slot = __gfn_to_memslot(slots, gfn);
> -	for (i = PT_DIRECTORY_LEVEL; i <= PT_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; ++i) {
> -		linfo = lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, i);
> -		linfo->disallow_lpage += 1;
> -	}
> +	kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(slot, gfn);
>  	kvm->arch.indirect_shadow_pages++;
>  }
>  
> @@ -798,18 +816,12 @@ static void unaccount_shadowed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_memslots *slots;
>  	struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> -	struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo;
>  	gfn_t gfn;
> -	int i;
>  
>  	gfn = sp->gfn;
>  	slots = kvm_memslots_for_spte_role(kvm, sp->role);
>  	slot = __gfn_to_memslot(slots, gfn);
> -	for (i = PT_DIRECTORY_LEVEL; i <= PT_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; ++i) {
> -		linfo = lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, i);
> -		linfo->disallow_lpage -= 1;
> -		WARN_ON(linfo->disallow_lpage < 0);
> -	}
> +	kvm_mmu_gfn_allow_lpage(slot, gfn);
>  	kvm->arch.indirect_shadow_pages--;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> index 55ffb7b..de92bed 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> @@ -174,4 +174,7 @@ static inline bool permission_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *mmu,
>  
>  void kvm_mmu_invalidate_zap_all_pages(struct kvm *kvm);
>  void kvm_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn_start, gfn_t gfn_end);
> +
> +void kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
> +void kvm_mmu_gfn_allow_lpage(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
>  #endif
> 

Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-19 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-14 11:31 [PATCH v3 00/11] KVM: x86: track guest page access Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] KVM: MMU: rename has_wrprotected_page to mmu_gfn_lpage_is_disallowed Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:08   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] KVM: MMU: introduce kvm_mmu_gfn_{allow,disallow}_lpage Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:09   ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] KVM: MMU: introduce kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:18   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] KVM: page track: add the framework of guest page tracking Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:24   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23  3:57     ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] KVM: page track: introduce kvm_page_track_{add,remove}_page Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:37   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23  4:18     ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-23 14:15       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-19 11:37   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23  4:18     ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] KVM: MMU: let page fault handler be aware tracked page Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:45   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23  4:19     ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] KVM: page track: add notifier support Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:51   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23  4:34     ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-23 14:16       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] KVM: MMU: use page track for non-leaf shadow pages Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] KVM: MMU: simplify mmu_need_write_protect Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] KVM: MMU: clear write-flooding on the fast path of tracked page Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:55   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23  4:36     ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] KVM: MMU: apply page track notifier Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:56   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23  4:40     ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-23 14:17       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-19 12:00 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] KVM: x86: track guest page access Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-22 10:05   ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-23  3:02     ` Jike Song
2016-02-23  5:44       ` Tian, Kevin
2016-02-23 12:13         ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23 10:01       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23 11:50         ` Jike Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56C6F7D3.3000205@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jike.song@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).