From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: KVM call for agenda for 2016-03-01
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:40:34 +0100
Message-ID: <56CEBE02.6090200@redhat.com>
References: <87mvqr7865.fsf@emacs.mitica>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=c3=a4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>,
	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	David Gibson <dgibson@redhat.com>,
	Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>, pkrempa@redhat.com
To: quintela@redhat.com, KVM devel mailing list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	QEMU Developer <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49001 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1758880AbcBYIki (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 25 Feb 2016 03:40:38 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87mvqr7865.fsf@emacs.mitica>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 23.02.2016 16:33, Juan Quintela wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.
> 
> At the end of Monday I will send an email with the agenda or the
> cancellation of the call, so hurry up.

Shall we talk about CPU hotplug again? There are a lot of discussions
going on, but as far as I can tell, it seems there is still no 100%
common understanding yet how the final solution should really look like...

 Thomas