kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oleg@redhat.com, namit@cs.technion.ac.il, avagin@gmail.com,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix missed hardware breakpoints
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:40:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D039B1.2030309@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56D02C01.2040400@linux.intel.com>



On 26/02/2016 11:42, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>
>> +    vcpu->arch.switch_db_regs |= KVM_DEBUGREG_RELOAD;
> 
> Er, i do not understand how it works. The BP is enabled in this test case so
> the debug registers are always reloaded before entering guest as
> KVM_DEBUGREG_BP_ENABLED bit is always set on switch_db_regs. What did i
> miss?
> 
> Another impact of this fix is when vcpu is rescheduled we need to always
> reload debug registers even if guest does not enable it, it is really needed?

Hi,

I have looked further at the bug and the issue is that the lazy debug
register optimization doesn't call kvm_update_dr7 and thus does not set
KVM_DEBUGREG_BP_ENABLED.  I will post a better patch shortly.  However,
I still think this one is simpler to have in stable kernel releases,
because it doesn't have any dependencies.

Paolo

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-26 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-19 10:56 [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix missed hardware breakpoints Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-26 10:42 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-26 11:28   ` Nadav Amit
2016-02-26 11:42     ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-26 11:53     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-26 11:40   ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56D039B1.2030309@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=avagin@gmail.com \
    --cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namit@cs.technion.ac.il \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).