From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Jörg Rödel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@amacapital.net>, x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>,
"kvm ML" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kvm: Make KVM DF intercept configurable
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 07:45:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D68C21.7080602@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160301224132.GE22677@pd.tnic>
On 2016-03-01 23:41, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:11:57PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> I just use QEMU's binary translation mode to debug this kind of code (-d
>> in_asm is useful and relatively compact (because it only shows loops
>> once),
>
> Ha, I had forgotten about "in_asm"! Thanks for reminding me, that's a
> really cool feature I'm going to use. With it I see:
>
> ----------------
> IN:
> 0x0000000001000000: mov 0xffffffff81cba1f8,%rsp
> 0x0000000001000008: callq 0x10001a9
>
> ----------------
>
> Now, it is obvious that 0xffffffff81cba1f8 is not mapped yet and we're
> running from physical addresses. The DF tracepoint shows, in addition,
> the previous exception vector causing the DF and I think that's useful.
> As an additional debugging aid. Oh, and that doesn't need ept=0 and runs
> at full speed.
>
>> or alternatively ept=0. But perhaps... why not. :) It's not like it
>> adds overhead.
>
> Yeah, it is off by default and doesn't hurt anyone. And the diff size
> is ok, IMHO. Lemme code the Intel side too and see how the whole thing
> turns out.
To make this a serious debug feature, we should consider trapping all
exceptions on request (and reinjecting the unhandled ones). Not sure
right now, though, if that comes with more complications than the simple
#DF case.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-02 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-01 19:28 [RFC PATCH] kvm: Make KVM DF intercept configurable Borislav Petkov
2016-03-01 21:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-01 22:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-02 6:45 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2016-03-02 9:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-02 9:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-02 9:22 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56D68C21.7080602@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox