From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] powerpc: Add tests for RTAS
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 14:02:01 +0100
Message-ID: <56D835C9.5060506@redhat.com>
References: <1457008099-29944-1-git-send-email-lvivier@redhat.com>
 <56D831E5.2030604@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: drjones@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, dgibson@redhat.com
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51011 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751002AbcCCNCF (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 3 Mar 2016 08:02:05 -0500
In-Reply-To: <56D831E5.2030604@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>



On 03/03/2016 13:45, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 03/03/2016 13:28, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> +
>> +#define DAYS(y,m,d) (365UL * (y) + ((y) / 4) - ((y) / 100) + ((y) / 400) + \
>> +		     367UL * (m) / 12  + \
> 
> Out of curiosity, where did you take this from?  I knew the variant with
> 2447/80 instead of 367/12, but they give the same result, as checked
> with bc:

Some ideas from:
http://www.cantab.net/users/michael.behrend/algorithms/easter/pages/main.html

30*m + (7*(m+1) / 12)

reduced into

(360m + 7m + 7)/12 -> 367m/12

Laurent

> $ bc
> for (n=1;n<=12;n++)2447*n/80-367*n/12;
> 0
> 0
> 0
> 0
> 0
> 0
> 0
> 0
> 0
> 0
> 0
> 0
> 
> Paolo
> 
>> +		     (d))
>> +