From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: drjones@redhat.com, dgibson@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] powerpc: Add tests for RTAS
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 17:54:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D86C5E.8050900@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457008099-29944-1-git-send-email-lvivier@redhat.com>
On 03.03.2016 13:28, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> By starting with get-time-of-day, set-time-of-day.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
> ---
...
> diff --git a/powerpc/rtas.c b/powerpc/rtas.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9d673f0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/powerpc/rtas.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
> +/*
> + * Test the RTAS interface
> + */
> +
> +#include <libcflat.h>
> +#include <util.h>
> +#include <asm/rtas.h>
> +
> +#define DAYS(y,m,d) (365UL * (y) + ((y) / 4) - ((y) / 100) + ((y) / 400) + \
> + 367UL * (m) / 12 + \
> + (d))
A friendly comment before that macro would be nice - since it is not so
obvious what it is doing when you see it for the first time.
> +static unsigned long mktime(int year, int month, int day,
> + int hour, int minute, int second)
> +{
> + unsigned long epoch;
> +
> + /* Put February at end of the year to avoid leap day this year */
> +
> + month -= 2;
> + if (month <= 0) {
> + month += 12;
> + year -= 1;
> + }
> +
> + /* compute epoch: substract DAYS(since_March(1-1-1970)) */
> +
> + epoch = DAYS(year, month, day) - DAYS(1969, 11, 1);
> +
> + epoch = epoch * 24 + hour;
> + epoch = epoch * 60 + minute;
> + epoch = epoch * 60 + second;
> +
> + return epoch;
> +}
> +
> +#define DELAY 1
> +#define MAX_LOOP 10000000
> +
> +static void check_get_time_of_day(unsigned long start)
> +{
> + int token;
> + int ret;
> + int now[8];
> + unsigned long t1, t2, count;
> +
> + token = rtas_token("get-time-of-day");
> + report("token available", token != RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE);
> + if (token == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE)
> + return;
> +
> + ret = rtas_call(token, 0, 8, now);
> + report("execution", ret == 0);
> +
> + report("second", now[5] >= 0 && now[5] <= 59);
> + report("minute", now[4] >= 0 && now[4] <= 59);
> + report("hour", now[3] >= 0 && now[3] <= 23);
> + report("day", now[2] >= 1 && now[2] <= 31);
> + report("month", now[1] >= 1 && now[1] <= 12);
> + report("year", now[0] >= 1970);
> + report("accuracy (< 3s)", mktime(now[0], now[1], now[2],
> + now[3], now[4], now[5]) - start < 3);
> +
> + ret = rtas_call(token, 0, 8, now);
Maybe make sure that ret == 0 here again? ... or you could simply omit
this call and recycle the results from the first rtas_call ?
> + t1 = mktime(now[0], now[1], now[2], now[3], now[4], now[5]);
> + count = 0;
> + do {
> + ret = rtas_call(token, 0, 8, now);
> + t2 = mktime(now[0], now[1], now[2], now[3], now[4], now[5]);
> + count++;
> + } while (t1 + DELAY > t2 && count < MAX_LOOP);
> + report("running", t1 + DELAY <= t2);
I think at least here you should add another "ret == 0" check again,
just to be sure.
> +}
> +
> +static void check_set_time_of_day(void)
> +{
> + int token;
> + int ret;
> + int date[8];
> + unsigned long t1, t2, count;
> +
> + token = rtas_token("set-time-of-day");
> + report("token available", token != RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE);
> + if (token == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE)
> + return;
> +
> + /* 23:59:59 28/2/2000 */
> +
> + ret = rtas_call(token, 7, 1, NULL, 2000, 2, 28, 23, 59, 59);
> + report("execution", ret == 0);
> +
> + /* check it has worked */
> + ret = rtas_call(rtas_token("get-time-of-day"), 0, 8, date);
> + report("re-read", ret == 0);
> + t1 = mktime(2000, 2, 28, 23, 59, 59);
> + t2 = mktime(date[0], date[1], date[2],
> + date[3], date[4], date[5]);
> + report("result", t2 - t1 < 2);
> +
> + /* check it is running */
> + count = 0;
> + do {
> + ret = rtas_call(rtas_token("get-time-of-day"), 0, 8, date);
> + t2 = mktime(date[0], date[1], date[2],
> + date[3], date[4], date[5]);
> + count++;
> + } while (t1 + DELAY > t2 && count < MAX_LOOP);
> + report("running", t1 + DELAY <= t2);
Please also add a check for "ret == 0" here ... just to be really,
really sure ;-)
> +}
... but apart from these minor issues, the patch looks pretty good to me
already!
Thomas
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-03 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-03 12:28 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] powerpc: Add tests for RTAS Laurent Vivier
2016-03-03 12:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-03 13:02 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-03-03 16:03 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-03 16:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-03 17:09 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-03 17:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-03 17:17 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-03 16:54 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56D86C5E.8050900@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=dgibson@redhat.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox