From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PART1 RFC v2 03/10] svm: Introduce new AVIC VMCB registers
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:51:39 +0700
Message-ID: <56E8055B.6030208@amd.com>
References: <1457124368-2025-1-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
 <1457124368-2025-4-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
 <56DDA1CF.4080207@redhat.com> <56E66B43.1000802@amd.com>
 <56E6ADB4.9040700@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<wei@redhat.com>, <sherry.hurwitz@amd.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	<joro@8bytes.org>, <bp@alien8.de>, <gleb@kernel.org>,
	<alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-bn1bon0064.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.56.111.64]:22266
	"EHLO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755348AbcCOMwK (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:52:10 -0400
In-Reply-To: <56E6ADB4.9040700@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>



On 03/14/2016 07:25 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 14/03/2016 08:41, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>> Any particular reason why you do not recommend the use of bit field?
>
> 1) The current coding style is generally not using bitfields
>
> 2) Having to review patches that change working code unrelated to AVIC
>
> 3) Most of the fields are not even used when AVIC is enabled, so the
> benefit of the conversion is small.
>
> Paolo
>

Ok I'll remove the bit-field stuff from patch 3 and will get rid off 
patch 4.

Thanks,
Suravee