From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: Turn kvm_ksym_ref into a NOP on VHE Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 21:55:51 +0100 Message-ID: <56F05FD7.9070706@redhat.com> References: <1458321959-11728-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <56EFEABA.3010604@redhat.com> <20160321124216.GA16859@cbox> <56EFFEEB.8020800@redhat.com> <20160321185524.GD16859@cbox> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: KVM devel mailing list , Ard Biesheuvel , Marc Zyngier , Catalin Marinas , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" To: Christoffer Dall Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]:38243 "EHLO mail-wm0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751100AbcCUUz4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:55:56 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id l68so137727333wml.1 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 13:55:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160321185524.GD16859@cbox> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 21/03/2016 19:55, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > Since you have two more patches, I guess you can just send a pull > > request for all three. I plan to send mine to Linus on Wednesday. > > Sounds good, I'll send you one tomorrow (based on Linus' master branch > of today - if that works?) Anything that you can test with works. Even basing it on your last pull request is okay for me, and it's better for future bisection if there's some known breakage in Linus's master branch. Paolo