From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: Inject pending interrupt even if pending nmi
 exist
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 22:11:00 +0100
Message-ID: <56F30664.8050006@redhat.com>
References: <7CC7D3013F4B10479273CE019E6A8C7A3ED90C@BPXM15GP.gisp.nec.co.jp>
 <56F297A7.1030309@redhat.com> <20160323172159.GA22164@potion.brq.redhat.com>
 <56F2DEDD.5060600@redhat.com> <20160323190406.GB22164@potion.brq.redhat.com>
 <56F3040B.8070006@redhat.com> <56F3055C.8090004@siemens.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Yuki Shibuya <shibuya.yk@ncos.nec.co.jp>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nobuo Yoshida <yoshida.nb@ncos.nec.co.jp>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	=?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:34826 "EHLO
	mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751447AbcCWVLF (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:11:05 -0400
Received: by mail-wm0-f66.google.com with SMTP id r129so1973925wmr.2
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 14:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <56F3055C.8090004@siemens.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>



On 23/03/2016 22:06, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > There is also at least one case where you could have one pending (but
> > not injected) and one latched NMI at instruction boundary, and that is
> > the special NMI shadow from the STI instruction.
> 
> This sounds to me like we should try to address the issue Yuki is seeing
> without playing with the nmi_pending counter.

Yes, it would be nice if my suggestion worked. :)

Paolo