From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: Inject pending interrupt even if pending nmi exist Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 12:09:10 +0100 Message-ID: <56F3CAD6.70307@redhat.com> References: <7CC7D3013F4B10479273CE019E6A8C7A3ED90C@BPXM15GP.gisp.nec.co.jp> <56F297A7.1030309@redhat.com> <20160323172159.GA22164@potion.brq.redhat.com> <56F2DEDD.5060600@redhat.com> <20160323190406.GB22164@potion.brq.redhat.com> <56F3040B.8070006@redhat.com> <56F3055C.8090004@siemens.com> <56F30664.8050006@redhat.com> <20160323215506.GA21516@potion.brq.redhat.com> <7CC7D3013F4B10479273CE019E6A8C7A3EDD8C@BPXM15GP.gisp.nec.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , Nobuo Yoshida To: Yuki Shibuya , =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Jan Kiszka Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:32874 "EHLO mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757166AbcCXLJN (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Mar 2016 07:09:13 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f66.google.com with SMTP id u125so11214132wmg.0 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 04:09:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7CC7D3013F4B10479273CE019E6A8C7A3EDD8C@BPXM15GP.gisp.nec.co.jp> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 24/03/2016 06:08, Yuki Shibuya wrote: > I really appreciate your cooperation and valuable discussion. I understand that > changing nmi_pending count is not good because it is not guaranteed as safe. > Sorry my mistake. > > I tested the logic suggested by Paolo in our environment, and it worked. I will > post v3, replacing second part by this logic. Great, it would be even better if you could contribute a regression test using the kvm-unit-tests framework. Paolo