From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
<joro@8bytes.org>, <bp@alien8.de>, <gleb@kernel.org>,
<alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<wei@redhat.com>, <sherry.hurwitz@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PART1 RFC v3 02/12] KVM: x86: Introducing kvm_x86_ops VM init/uninit hooks
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:00:03 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56FBA3A3.1060907@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56FA6B36.4030607@amd.com>
Hi Paolo,
On 3/29/16 18:47, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/29/2016 05:21 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 29/03/2016 07:27, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Adding function pointers in struct kvm_x86_ops for processor-specific
>>>>>> layer to provide hooks for when KVM initialize and un-initialize VM.
>>>> This is not the only thing your patch is doing, and the "other" change
>>>> definitely needs a lot more explanation about why you did it and how
>>>> you
>>>> audited the code to ensure that it is safe.
>>>>
>>>> Paolo
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry, for not mentioning this earlier. I am moving the
>>> kvm_arch_init_vm() call mainly to go after mutex_init(&kvm->slots_lock)
>>> since I am calling the x86_set_memory_region() (which uses slots_lock)
>>> in the vm_init() hooks (for AVIC initialization).
>>>
>>> Lemme re-check if this would be safe for other code.
>>
>> No problem. In the meanwhile a patch got in ("KVM: fix spin_lock_init
>> order on x86") that should help you.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Paolo
>>
>
> Right.... that's just what I need :) I'll re-base to the latest tip then.
Actually, in the file virt/kvm/kvm_main.c, I still need to move the
kvm_arch_init_vm() to some place after the call to kvm_alloc_memslots()
since I am calling x86_set_memory_region() in the vm_init hook.
r = -ENOMEM;
for (i = 0; i < KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM; i++) {
kvm->memslots[i] = kvm_alloc_memslots();
if (!kvm->memslots[i])
goto out_err_no_srcu;
}
if (init_srcu_struct(&kvm->srcu))
goto out_err_no_srcu;
if (init_srcu_struct(&kvm->irq_srcu))
goto out_err_no_irq_srcu;
for (i = 0; i < KVM_NR_BUSES; i++) {
kvm->buses[i] = kzalloc(sizeof(struct kvm_io_bus),
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!kvm->buses[i])
goto out_err;
}
//HERE
r = kvm_arch_init_vm(kvm, type);
if (r)
goto out_err;
Do you think that would be a problem?
Thanks,
Suravee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-30 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-18 6:09 [PART1 RFC v3 00/12] KVM: x86: Introduce SVM AVIC support Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 6:09 ` [PART1 RFC v3 01/12] KVM: x86: Misc LAPIC changes to expose helper functions Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 11:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-18 6:09 ` [PART1 RFC v3 02/12] KVM: x86: Introducing kvm_x86_ops VM init/uninit hooks Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 10:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-29 5:27 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-29 10:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-29 11:47 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-30 10:00 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit [this message]
2016-03-30 12:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-30 12:18 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 6:09 ` [PART1 RFC v3 03/12] KVM: x86: Introducing kvm_x86_ops VCPU blocking/unblocking hooks Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 10:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-18 6:09 ` [PART1 RFC v3 04/12] KVM: split kvm_vcpu_wake_up from kvm_vcpu_kick Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 10:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-18 6:09 ` [PART1 RFC v3 05/12] svm: Introduce new AVIC VMCB registers Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 10:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-18 6:09 ` [PART1 RFC v3 06/12] KVM: x86: Detect and Initialize AVIC support Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 11:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-18 6:09 ` [PART1 RFC v3 07/12] svm: Add interrupt injection via AVIC Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 10:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-04-05 13:26 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-04-05 15:56 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 6:09 ` [PART1 RFC v3 08/12] KVM: x86: Add trace events for AVIC Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 10:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-28 11:27 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 6:09 ` [PART1 RFC v3 09/12] svm: Add VMEXIT handlers " Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 11:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-18 6:09 ` [PART1 RFC v3 10/12] svm: Do not expose x2APIC when enable AVIC Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 20:59 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-31 4:15 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-31 11:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-04-05 10:14 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 6:09 ` [PART1 RFC v3 11/12] svm: Do not intercept CR8 " Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 21:10 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-30 12:15 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 6:09 ` [PART1 RFC v3 12/12] svm: Manage vcpu load/unload " Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-18 21:44 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-31 8:52 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-03-31 14:19 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-04-05 10:07 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-04-05 14:56 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-04-06 3:40 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2016-04-06 12:36 ` Radim Krčmář
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56FBA3A3.1060907@amd.com \
--to=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=sherry.hurwitz@amd.com \
--cc=wei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).