From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: IVSHMEM device performance
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 14:03:40 +0200
Message-ID: <57137B9C.201@redhat.com>
References: <VI1PR02MB17275FD1274A0D7C24956E8283940@VI1PR02MB1727.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
 <570F90DF.7040904@redhat.com>
 <VI1PR02MB17276BB47B06BF394FD4319F836A0@VI1PR02MB1727.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
To: Eli Britstein <eli.britstein@toganetworks.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56490 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751585AbcDQMDo (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 17 Apr 2016 08:03:44 -0400
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR02MB17276BB47B06BF394FD4319F836A0@VI1PR02MB1727.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>



On 17/04/2016 09:18, Eli Britstein wrote:
> Attached. Also, if need to change ioremap to ioremap_cache, please
> advise where. I assume in mmap it is already too late.

No, you need not do that.  If memory was uncached, the performance
penalty would be 100x or worse.

Paolo