From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suravee Suthikulpanit Subject: Re: [PART1 RFC v4 01/11] KVM: x86: Misc LAPIC changes to expose helper functions Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 03:29:16 +0700 Message-ID: <5715439C.9030307@amd.com> References: <1460017232-17429-1-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> <1460017232-17429-2-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> <20160411203449.GA32480@potion.brq.redhat.com> <57153C18.6020104@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: , , , , , , , , To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= Return-path: Received: from mail-bn1on0069.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.56.110.69]:15392 "EHLO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752416AbcDRU32 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Apr 2016 16:29:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <57153C18.6020104@amd.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/19/2016 02:57 AM, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: > Radim, > > On 04/12/2016 03:34 AM, Radim Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99 wrote: >> 2016-04-07 03:20-0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit: >>> Exporting LAPIC utility functions and macros for re-use in SVM code= =2E >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit >>> --- >> >> Adding kvm_lapic_set_reg looks weird when KVM has kvm_apic_get_reg, = but >> the structure they accept is called kvm_lapic, so I vote to rename g= et, >> >> Reviewed-by: Radim Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99 >> > > Sure. Within the same patch, I can rename kvm_apic_get_reg to > kvm_lapic_get_reg to be consistent. > Think again, I'll do this on a separate patch. Suravee