From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suravee Suthikulpanit Subject: Re: [PART1 RFC v4 02/11] KVM: x86: Introducing kvm_x86_ops VM init/uninit hooks Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:40:15 -0500 Message-ID: <5715462F.6090303@amd.com> References: <1460017232-17429-1-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> <1460017232-17429-3-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> <20160411204937.GA6762@potion.brq.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: , , , , , , , , To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160411204937.GA6762@potion.brq.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Radim, On 04/12/2016 03:49 AM, Radim Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99 wrote: > 2016-04-07 03:20-0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit: >> Adding function pointers in struct kvm_x86_ops for processor-specifi= c >> layer to provide hooks for when KVM initialize and un-initialize VM. >> >> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit >> --- >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c >> @@ -7781,6 +7784,9 @@ static void kvm_free_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm) >> kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) >> kvm_arch_vcpu_free(vcpu); >> >> + if (kvm_x86_ops->vm_uninit) >> + kvm_x86_ops->vm_uninit(kvm); > > vm_uninit() doesn't seem to have much to do with kvm_free_vcpus(), > please call it from kvm_arch_destroy_vm(). > > (kvm_x86_ops.vm_destroy would be a better name then.) > Okay. I'll rename this and move the hook to be called from=20 kvm_arch_destroy_vm(). Thanks, Suravee