kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
To: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Cc: eric.auger@st.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com, andre.przywara@arm.com,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	patches@linaro.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, p.fedin@samsung.com,
	Manish.Jaggi@caviumnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] KVM: arm/arm64: build a default routing table
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:51:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5718E8EA.4080801@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160414120505.GG30804@cbox>

On 04/14/2016 02:05 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:47:35AM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
>> Implement a default routing table made of flat irqchip routing
>> entries (gsi = irqchip.pin) covering the VGIC SPI indexes.
>> This routing table is overwritten by the first user-space call
>> to KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING ioctl.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
>>
> 
> so before applying this patch, but after applying the previous patch,
> will our current GICv2m-based MSI injection work?

If you don't apply that patch and kernel does not build a default table,
userspace is obliged to do the job. if it doesn't the irqfd-> virtual
gsi forwarding will fail. So effectively it makes sense to squash both
patches.

> 
> If not, is there a better split of these patches (e.g. squash this one
> into the previous one)?
> 
>> ---
>> ---
>>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_init.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_init.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_init.c
>> index e4459e3..041443b 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_init.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_init.c
>> @@ -261,6 +261,10 @@ int vgic_init(struct kvm *kvm)
>>  	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
>>  		kvm_vgic_vcpu_init(vcpu);
>>  
>> +	ret = kvm_setup_default_irq_routing(kvm);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto out;
>> +
>>  	dist->initialized = true;
>>  out:
>>  	return ret;
>> @@ -454,3 +458,23 @@ out_free_irq:
>>  			kvm_get_running_vcpus());
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>> +
>> +int kvm_setup_default_irq_routing(struct kvm *kvm)
>> +{
>> +	struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *entries;
>> +	struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
>> +	u32 nr = dist->nr_spis;
>> +	int i, ret;
>> +
>> +	entries = kcalloc(nr, sizeof(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry),
>> +			  GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> I think you need to check if the allocation succeeded here or not...
sure

thanks

Eric
> 
>> +	for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
>> +		entries[i].gsi = i;
>> +		entries[i].type = KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_IRQCHIP;
>> +		entries[i].u.irqchip.irqchip = 0;
>> +		entries[i].u.irqchip.pin = i;
>> +	}
>> +	ret = kvm_set_irq_routing(kvm, entries, nr, 0);
>> +	kfree(entries);
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> -- 
>> 1.9.1
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-21 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-04  8:47 [RFC v4 0/7] KVM: arm/arm64: gsi routing support Eric Auger
2016-04-04  8:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] KVM: api: pass the devid in the msi routing entry Eric Auger
2016-04-14 12:04   ` Christoffer Dall
2016-04-21 13:31     ` Eric Auger
2016-04-04  8:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] KVM: kvm_host: add devid in kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry Eric Auger
2016-04-14 12:04   ` Christoffer Dall
2016-04-04  8:47 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] KVM: irqchip: convey devid to kvm_set_msi Eric Auger
2016-04-14 12:04   ` Christoffer Dall
2016-04-04  8:47 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] KVM: arm/arm64: enable irqchip routing Eric Auger
2016-04-14 12:04   ` Christoffer Dall
2016-04-14 12:06     ` Christoffer Dall
2016-04-21 14:44     ` Eric Auger
2016-04-04  8:47 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] KVM: arm/arm64: build a default routing table Eric Auger
2016-04-14 12:05   ` Christoffer Dall
2016-04-21 14:51     ` Eric Auger [this message]
2016-04-04  8:47 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] KVM: arm/arm64: enable MSI routing Eric Auger
2016-04-14 12:04   ` Christoffer Dall
2016-04-04  8:47 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] KVM: arm: enable KVM_SIGNAL_MSI and " Eric Auger
2016-04-14 12:12   ` Christoffer Dall
2016-04-21 14:56     ` Eric Auger
2016-04-04 10:15 ` [RFC v4 0/7] KVM: arm/arm64: gsi routing support Pavel Fedin
2016-04-04 12:12   ` Eric Auger
2016-04-14 12:04 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-04-21 13:32   ` Eric Auger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5718E8EA.4080801@linaro.org \
    --to=eric.auger@linaro.org \
    --cc=Manish.Jaggi@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=eric.auger@st.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=p.fedin@samsung.com \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).