From: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
To: "Jan Kiszka" <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, gleb@redhat.com,
mst@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Enable more than 255 VCPU support without irq remapping function in the guest
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 13:15:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57204B0C.7060706@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <571F9487.5090009@siemens.com>
On 2016年04月27日 00:17, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2016-04-26 18:14, Lan, Tianyu wrote:
>> Hi All:
>>
>> Recently I am working on extending max vcpu to more than 256 on the both
>> KVM/Xen. For some HPC cases, it needs many vcpus. The job requires to
>> use X2APIC in the guest which supports 32-bit APIC id. Linux kernel
>> requires irq remapping function during enabling X2APIC when max APIC id
>> is more than 255(More detail please see try_to_enable_x2apic()).
>>
>> The irq remapping function helps to deliver irq to cpu 255~. IOAPIC just
>> supports 8-bit target APIC id field and only can deliver irq to
>> cpu 0~255.
>>
>> So far both KVM/Xen doesn't enable irq remapping function. If enable the
>> function, it seems a huge job which need to rework IO-APIC, local APIC,
>> MSI parts and add virtual VTD support in the KVM.
>>
>> Other quick way to enable more than 256 VCPUs is to eliminate the
>> dependency between irq remapping and X2APIC in the guest linux kernel.
>> So far I can boot the guest after removing the dependency.
>> The side effect I thought is that irq only can deliver to 0~255 vcpus
>> but 256 vcpus seem enough to balance irq requests in the guest. In the
>> most cases, there are fewer devices in the guest.
>>
>> I wonder whether it's feasible. There maybe some other side effects I
>> didn't think of. Very appreciate for your comments.
>
> Radim is working on the KVM side already, Peter is currently driving the
> VT-d interrupt emulation topic in QEMU. It's in reach, I would say. :)
Oh. Thanks for your information. Very helpful :)
>
> Jan
>
> PS: Please no PV mess, at least without good reasons.
>
--
Best regards
Tianyu Lan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-27 5:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-26 16:14 Enable more than 255 VCPU support without irq remapping function in the guest Lan, Tianyu
2016-04-26 16:17 ` Jan Kiszka
2016-04-26 16:49 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-04-27 4:10 ` Yang Zhang
2016-04-27 5:24 ` Jan Kiszka
2016-04-27 6:24 ` Lan Tianyu
2016-04-27 6:56 ` Jan Kiszka
2016-04-27 9:39 ` Yang Zhang
2016-04-27 9:45 ` Jan Kiszka
2016-04-28 1:11 ` Yang Zhang
2016-04-28 6:54 ` Jan Kiszka
2016-04-28 15:32 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-04-29 2:09 ` Yang Zhang
2016-04-29 3:01 ` Nadav Amit
2016-05-03 1:34 ` Yang Zhang
2016-04-29 4:59 ` Jan Kiszka
2016-05-03 1:52 ` Yang Zhang
2016-05-03 2:03 ` Nadav Amit
2016-05-03 4:55 ` Jan Kiszka
2016-05-04 1:46 ` Yang Zhang
2016-05-04 1:56 ` Nadav Amit
2016-05-04 5:38 ` Jan Kiszka
2016-04-27 5:39 ` Lan Tianyu
2016-04-27 14:38 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-04-27 5:15 ` Lan Tianyu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57204B0C.7060706@intel.com \
--to=tianyu.lan@intel.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).