From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: halt_polling: provide a way to qualify wakeups during poll Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 14:29:20 +0200 Message-ID: <5735C8A0.1080305@redhat.com> References: <1463134596-19470-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <1463134596-19470-2-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <5735C24A.50302@redhat.com> <5735C7EA.3030401@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: KVM , Cornelia Huck , linux-s390 To: Christian Borntraeger , =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34823 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752973AbcEMM3Y (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 May 2016 08:29:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5735C7EA.3030401@de.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 13/05/2016 14:26, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> > >> > On 13/05/2016 12:16, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>> >> +config HAVE_KVM_INVALID_POLLS >>> >> + bool >>> >> + >> > >> > I'll change the config item to HAVE_KVM_INVALID_WAKEUPS, otherwise looks >> > good. > Can you do that or shall I resend as pull request? I'll do this. Paolo > Regarding 4.7 vs. 4.8 > Lets do this for 4.7. In the unlikely case that there is some bigger fallout > we can still revert or fix for 2 1/2 month but it really seems to help. > >