From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] vhost_net: conditionally enable tx polling
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 14:48:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5757BFB2.6020400@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160607152407-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
On 2016年06月07日 20:26, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 01:56:34AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote:
>> We always poll tx for socket, this is sub optimal since:
>>
>> - it will be only used when we exceed the sndbuf of the socket.
>> - since we use two independent polls for tx and vq, this will slightly
>> increase the waitqueue traversing time and more important, vhost
>> could not benefit from commit
>> 9e641bdcfa4ef4d6e2fbaa59c1be0ad5d1551fd5 ("net-tun: restructure
>> tun_do_read for better sleep/wakeup efficiency") even if we've
>> stopped rx polling during handle_rx since tx poll were still left in
>> the waitqueue.
>>
>> Fix this by conditionally enable tx polling only when -EAGAIN were
>> met.
>>
>> Test shows about 8% improvement on guest rx pps.
>>
>> Before: ~1350000
>> After: ~1460000
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/vhost/net.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
>> index 1d3e45f..e75ffcc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
>> @@ -378,6 +378,7 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
>> goto out;
>>
>> vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
>> + vhost_net_disable_vq(net, vq);
>>
>> hdr_size = nvq->vhost_hlen;
>> zcopy = nvq->ubufs;
>> @@ -459,6 +460,8 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
>> % UIO_MAXIOV;
>> }
>> vhost_discard_vq_desc(vq, 1);
>> + if (err == -EAGAIN)
>> + vhost_net_enable_vq(net, vq);
>> break;
>> }
>> if (err != len)
> This seems rather risky. What if TX failed for some other reason?
> Polling won't ever be re-enabled ...
>
But why we need to enable tx poll in this case? Even if we enable it, we
wont' get any wakeup.
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-08 6:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-01 5:56 [PATCH V3 0/2] vhost_net polling optimization Jason Wang
2016-06-01 5:56 ` [PATCH V3 1/2] vhost_net: stop polling socket during rx processing Jason Wang
2016-06-07 12:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-06-07 21:46 ` David Miller
2016-06-01 5:56 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] vhost_net: conditionally enable tx polling Jason Wang
2016-06-07 12:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-06-08 6:48 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2016-06-02 19:08 ` [PATCH V3 0/2] vhost_net polling optimization David Miller
2016-06-03 13:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5757BFB2.6020400@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox