From: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
To: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] mmu: don't set the present bit unconditionally
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:30:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <576A144D.90007@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466478746-14153-4-git-send-email-bsd@redhat.com>
On 06/21/2016 11:12 AM, Bandan Das wrote:
> To support execute only mappings on behalf of L1 hypervisors,
> we teach set_spte to honor L1's valid XWR bits. This is only
> if host supports EPT execute only. Use ACC_USER_MASK to signify
> if the L1 hypervisor has the present bit set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 11 ++++++++---
> arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index 57d8696..3ca1a99 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -2528,7 +2528,8 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
> if (set_mmio_spte(vcpu, sptep, gfn, pfn, pte_access))
> return 0;
>
> - spte = PT_PRESENT_MASK;
> + if (!shadow_xonly_valid)
> + spte = PT_PRESENT_MASK;
The xonly info can be fetched from vcpu->mmu. shadow_xonly_valid looks like
can be dropped.
> if (!speculative)
> spte |= shadow_accessed_mask;
>
> @@ -2537,8 +2538,12 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
> else
> spte |= shadow_nx_mask;
>
> - if (pte_access & ACC_USER_MASK)
> - spte |= shadow_user_mask;
> + if (pte_access & ACC_USER_MASK) {
> + if (shadow_xonly_valid)
> + spte |= PT_PRESENT_MASK;
> + else
> + spte |= shadow_user_mask;
> + }
It can be simplified by setting shadow_user_mask to PT_PRESENT_MASK
if ept enabled.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-22 4:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-21 3:12 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add support for EPT execute only for nested hypervisors Bandan Das
2016-06-21 3:12 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] mmu: add a boolean to indicate host ept execute only support Bandan Das
2016-06-21 3:12 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] mmu: Update ept specific valid bit values Bandan Das
2016-06-21 8:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-22 4:09 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-06-21 3:12 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] mmu: don't set the present bit unconditionally Bandan Das
2016-06-21 8:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-21 8:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-22 16:10 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-22 16:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-22 16:23 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-22 4:30 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2016-06-22 16:21 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-21 3:12 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] vmx: advertise support for ept execute only Bandan Das
2016-06-22 4:39 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add support for EPT execute only for nested hypervisors Xiao Guangrong
2016-06-22 16:34 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-23 5:03 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-06-24 2:56 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-24 4:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-24 4:50 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-24 6:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-24 7:02 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-06-24 16:19 ` Bandan Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=576A144D.90007@linux.intel.com \
--to=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bsd@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox