From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yu Zhang Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] KVM: Emulate UMIP (or almost do so) Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:02:02 +0800 Message-ID: <58C25D7A.7070605@linux.intel.com> References: <1468351223-3250-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <0543af50-8961-38a7-1acc-aaefd4915dda@redhat.com> <58B68E91.4010400@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: qian.ouyang@intel.com, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" To: Paolo Bonzini Return-path: In-Reply-To: <58B68E91.4010400@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 3/1/2017 5:04 PM, Yu Zhang wrote: > > > On 12/13/2016 7:03 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >> On 13/12/2016 05:03, Li, Liang Z wrote: >>> Hi Paolo, >>> >>> We intended to enable UMIP for KVM and found you had already worked >>> on it. >>> Do you have any plan for the following patch set? It's there >>> anything else you expect >>> us help to do? >> Yes, I plan to resend these patches for 4.11. > > Hi Paolo, > > Previously we saw your RFC patches of UMIP sent out, and we would > like to try some unit test in Intel. I found a patch written by you in > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9225929/, guess this is for the kvm > unit test(though I failed to git apply it directly). > And I wonder, when will it be integrated to kvm unit test repo? > Besides, is this all the test for UMIP unit test? I.e. do we need to > construct a scenario in the test to trigger vm exit and let hypervisor > inject a GP fault? - I did not see this scenario in this patch. Or any > other suggestions? :-) > Hi Paolo, any suggestions? Sorry for the disturb. :) Yu > Thanks > Yu >