From: "Longpeng (Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <rkrcmar@redhat.com>, <agraf@suse.com>,
<borntraeger@de.ibm.com>, <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
<marc.zyngier@arm.com>, <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<weidong.huang@huawei.com>, <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>,
<wangxinxin.wang@huawei.com>, <longpeng.mike@gmail.com>,
<david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: optimize the kvm_vcpu_on_spin
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 16:14:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <598972E3.1030807@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170808094153.1b5bf8f4@gondolin>
On 2017/8/8 15:41, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 12:05:31 +0800
> "Longpeng(Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> This is a simple optimization for kvm_vcpu_on_spin, the
>> main idea is described in patch-1's commit msg.
>
> I think this generally looks good now.
>
>>
>> I did some tests base on the RFC version, the result shows
>> that it can improves the performance slightly.
>
> Did you re-run tests on this version?
Hi Cornelia,
I didn't re-run tests on V2. But the major difference between RFC and V2
is that V2 only cache result for X86 (s390/arm needn't) and V2 saves a
expensive operation ( 440-1400 cycles on my test machine ) for X86/VMX.
So I think V2's performance is at least the same as RFC or even slightly
better. :)
>
> I would also like to see some s390 numbers; unfortunately I only have a
> z/VM environment and any performance numbers would be nearly useless
> there. Maybe somebody within IBM with a better setup can run a quick
> test?
>
> .
>
--
Regards,
Longpeng(Mike)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-08 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-08 4:05 [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: optimize the kvm_vcpu_on_spin Longpeng(Mike)
2017-08-08 4:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: add spinlock optimization framework Longpeng(Mike)
2017-08-08 7:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-08 7:43 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-08 8:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-08 8:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-08 9:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-08 9:35 ` Longpeng (Mike)
2017-08-08 4:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: X86: implement the logic for spinlock optimization Longpeng(Mike)
2017-08-08 7:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-08 8:31 ` Longpeng (Mike)
2017-08-08 8:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-08 4:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: s390: implements the kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel() Longpeng(Mike)
2017-08-08 7:37 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-08 8:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-08 4:05 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: arm: " Longpeng(Mike)
2017-08-08 7:39 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-08 7:41 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-08 7:41 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: optimize the kvm_vcpu_on_spin Cornelia Huck
2017-08-08 8:14 ` Longpeng (Mike) [this message]
2017-08-10 13:18 ` Eric Farman
2017-08-11 1:43 ` Longpeng (Mike)
2017-08-11 7:19 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-08-08 11:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-08 11:30 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-08 11:49 ` Longpeng (Mike)
2017-08-08 11:50 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=598972E3.1030807@huawei.com \
--to=longpeng2@huawei.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.com \
--cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longpeng.mike@gmail.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=wangxinxin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=weidong.huang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox