Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: X86: implement the logic for spinlock optimization

["Longpeng (Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com>]

On 2017/8/8 15:30, Paolo Bonzini wrote:

> On 08/08/2017 06:05, Longpeng(Mike) wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
>> index cd0e6e6..dec5e8a 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
>> @@ -1268,7 +1268,7 @@ int kvm_hv_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>  
>>  	switch (code) {
>>  	case HVCALL_NOTIFY_LONG_SPIN_WAIT:
>> -		kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu, kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(vcpu));
>> +		kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu, kvm_x86_ops->spin_in_kernel(vcpu));
>>  		break;
>>  	case HVCALL_POST_MESSAGE:
>>  	case HVCALL_SIGNAL_EVENT:
> 
> This can be true as well.  I can change this on commit.
> 


Thanks,
hope you could help me to fix the same problem in patch-1(s390) too.

> Paolo
> 
> .
> 


-- 
Regards,
Longpeng(Mike)