From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Longpeng (Mike)" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: X86: implement the logic for spinlock optimization Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 16:31:15 +0800 Message-ID: <598976D3.6090202@huawei.com> References: <1502165135-4784-1-git-send-email-longpeng2@huawei.com> <1502165135-4784-3-git-send-email-longpeng2@huawei.com> <58915b27-bbbe-8c2d-43b6-65fa8e1c0c17@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , , , To: Paolo Bonzini Return-path: In-Reply-To: <58915b27-bbbe-8c2d-43b6-65fa8e1c0c17@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 2017/8/8 15:30, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 08/08/2017 06:05, Longpeng(Mike) wrote: >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c >> index cd0e6e6..dec5e8a 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c >> @@ -1268,7 +1268,7 @@ int kvm_hv_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> >> switch (code) { >> case HVCALL_NOTIFY_LONG_SPIN_WAIT: >> - kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu, kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(vcpu)); >> + kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu, kvm_x86_ops->spin_in_kernel(vcpu)); >> break; >> case HVCALL_POST_MESSAGE: >> case HVCALL_SIGNAL_EVENT: > > This can be true as well. I can change this on commit. > Thanks, hope you could help me to fix the same problem in patch-1(s390) too. > Paolo > > . > -- Regards, Longpeng(Mike)